> On Feb 8, 2019, at 3:58 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
>> On 08.02.19 12:11, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>>> On 2/8/19 12:10 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> Upstream GCC has removed the powerpcspe support in GCC 9, and I'd like to
>>> stop
>>> building the powerpcspe cross compilers for sid
On 08.02.19 12:11, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 2/8/19 12:10 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Upstream GCC has removed the powerpcspe support in GCC 9, and I'd like to
>> stop
>> building the powerpcspe cross compilers for sid/buster.
>
> Can we wait until gcc-9 is the default compiler?
no,
On 2/8/19 12:10 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Upstream GCC has removed the powerpcspe support in GCC 9, and I'd like to stop
> building the powerpcspe cross compilers for sid/buster.
Can we wait until gcc-9 is the default compiler?
Thanks,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debia
Upstream GCC has removed the powerpcspe support in GCC 9, and I'd like to stop
building the powerpcspe cross compilers for sid/buster. This doesn't affect the
native GCC 8 builds, but only gcc-8-cross-ports, gcc-7-cross-ports,
gcc-defaults-ports and binutils.
Matthias
Your message dated Mon, 18 Apr 2016 18:43:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#821336: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #741234,
regarding src:gcc-4.8: [PATCH] When building cross-compilers using prebuilt
libraries, no longer re-build those libraries
to
Your message dated Fri, 04 Dec 2015 15:41:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#806479: fixed in gcc-5 5.3.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #806479,
regarding gcc-5: please allow building cross compilers targeting x86 cpus
without building hppa64 cross compilers
to be marked as done
On 28.11.2015 07:12, Helmut Grohne wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 02:58:31AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
No. Why would you handle hppa as a secondary or ternary architecture? You
need the hppa64 cross compiler to bootstrap hppa. Other architectures
require a multilib enabled compiler to bootst
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 02:58:31AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> No. Why would you handle hppa as a secondary or ternary architecture? You
> need the hppa64 cross compiler to bootstrap hppa. Other architectures
> require a multilib enabled compiler to bootstrap the architecture, however
> hppa/hp
On 27.11.2015 20:54, Helmut Grohne wrote:
Source: gcc-5
Version: 5.2.1-26
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
Hi Matthias,
When building cross compilers targeting amd64, i386 or x32 by writing
the arch name to debian/target, the build process tries to
Source: gcc-5
Version: 5.2.1-26
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
Hi Matthias,
When building cross compilers targeting amd64, i386 or x32 by writing
the arch name to debian/target, the build process tries to build hppa64
cross compilers. This seems a bit
I didn't yet look at the patches, and probably won't before 4.9 is released. I
would prefer if you could work on 4.9, and then backport patches to 4.8 if needed.
Am 10.03.2014 10:19, schrieb Dima Kogan:
Package: src:gcc-4.8
Severity: normal
Hi.
This is the cross-build-specific half of the patc
Wookey writes:
> Doko pointed out that the java cross-compiler is needed in order to be
> able to cross-build the compiler itself. So we probably should build
> that by default (and document how to turn it off for bootstrapping or
> local-build purposes)
>
> I'm not sure if the same argument appl
+++ Dima Kogan [2014-03-10 02:19 -0700]:
> Package: src:gcc-4.8
> Severity: normal
> Hi.
>
> This is the cross-build-specific half of the patches originally posted
> in
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=738152
>
> The first half (filled-in missing logic) is here:
>
> htt
Package: src:gcc-4.8
Severity: normal
Hi.
This is the cross-build-specific half of the patches originally posted
in
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=738152
The first half (filled-in missing logic) is here:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740005
This set o
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jun 2012 18:04:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#675511: fixed in gcc-4.7 4.7.0-13
has caused the Debian Bug report #675511,
regarding gcc-4.7: Please drop dpkg-cross build-dependency when building
cross-compilers
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Acked-by: Marcin Juszkiewicz
This kind of patch was on my todo list for quite long time. It is safe
to merge and would be great to get it in wheezy.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Ar
Package: gcc-4.7
Version: 4.7.0-11
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hi,
The build process itself doesn't involve dpkg-cross at all, but dpkg-cross is
added to Build-Depends when building a cross-compiler.
The attached patch fixes that.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers
It would be nice if somebody on the embedded list could have a look at
#380251.I have slightly modified README.cross more up to date. Patch attached.If you are trying to build a cross gcc-4.1, take a look to #391445.Regards, Hector Oron
README.cross.patch
Description: Binary data
Package: gcc-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-9
Severity: minor
Hi,
I'm currently trying to build cross-compilers on my system. I found two
issues:
* Following the guidelines in debian/README.cross does not work; a plain
"dpkg-buildpackage" calls debian/rules clean, which regenerates
debian/control for a
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 09:49:14PM +0100, Daniel Widenfalk wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to help Haakan Ardo with the toolchain-source package
> and I'm having trouble building a cross compiler. First I must
> say that I'm not yet 100% done with integrating the 4.0.3 line
> of gcc into the toolc
Hi all,
I'm trying to help Haakan Ardo with the toolchain-source package
and I'm having trouble building a cross compiler. First I must
say that I'm not yet 100% done with integrating the 4.0.3 line
of gcc into the toolchain-source package and that is why I need
your help.
I can build binutils a
21 matches
Mail list logo
