Am 28.07.2014 um 18:45 schrieb Christian Svensson:
> We have a "stripped down" port of both, but they are not close to
> ready for upstream.
please file debian reports including these patches, and please file rfq's
upstream containing your current patches.
> However I'm curious how those are rela
We have a "stripped down" port of both, but they are not close to
ready for upstream.
However I'm curious how those are related to this bug? I cannot see
that this change would make it not dependent on those two.
Alternatively, are you saying that all we need to port GCJ is libgc
and libffi?
TBH I
Am 28.07.2014 um 01:53 schrieb Christian Svensson:
> Package: gcc-defaults
> Version: 1.130
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> OpenRISC does not have a Java port.
> I would be grateful if it could be added to java_no_arches.
>
> I'm not sure if gcj49_arches should be mod
Package: gcc-defaults
Version: 1.130
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
OpenRISC does not have a Java port.
I would be grateful if it could be added to java_no_arches.
I'm not sure if gcj49_arches should be modified, but java_no_arches
definitely should.
-- System Information:
Debi
4 matches
Mail list logo
