Bug#746426: gcc: Enable -fasynchronous-unwind-tables on more arches

2021-04-28 Thread Matthias Klose
gcc-11 enables this on amd64 arm64 i386 ppc64 ppc64el s390x x32 Are there other architectures where it's safe to enable this?

Bug#746426: gcc: Enable -fasynchronous-unwind-tables on more arches.

2015-12-28 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 08:03:25PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:45:27AM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 00:03 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > > Am 30.04.2014 00:04, schrieb Kurt Roeckx: > > > > > So reading about this, this might break glibc when you

Bug#746426: gcc: Enable -fasynchronous-unwind-tables on more arches.

2014-05-19 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:45:27AM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 00:03 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > Am 30.04.2014 00:04, schrieb Kurt Roeckx: > > > > So reading about this, this might break glibc when you enable it > > > > and they might need to build some files without it.

Bug#746426: gcc: Enable -fasynchronous-unwind-tables on more arches.

2014-05-18 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 00:03 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > Am 30.04.2014 00:04, schrieb Kurt Roeckx: > > > So reading about this, this might break glibc when you enable it > > > and they might need to build some files without it. > > > > Is this enabled by any other distributions? > > I assume thi

Bug#746426: gcc: Enable -fasynchronous-unwind-tables on more arches.

2014-05-18 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 04:37:47PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Control: tags -1 + wontfix > > Am 30.04.2014 00:04, schrieb Kurt Roeckx: > > So reading about this, this might break glibc when you enable it > > and they might need to build some files without it. > > Is this enabled by any other

Bug#746426: gcc: Enable -fasynchronous-unwind-tables on more arches.

2014-05-18 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Sun, 2014-05-18 at 16:37 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Is this enabled by any other distributions? On fedora and RHEL -fasynchronous-unwind-tables is enabled on all architectures for gcc (otherwise rpmbuild will add it as standard flag). So all packages are always build with it so you will alw

Processed: Re: Bug#746426: gcc: Enable -fasynchronous-unwind-tables on more arches.

2014-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + wontfix Bug #746426 [gcc-4.9] gcc: Enable -fasynchronous-unwind-tables on more arches. Added tag(s) wontfix. -- 746426: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746426 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To

Bug#746426: gcc: Enable -fasynchronous-unwind-tables on more arches.

2014-05-18 Thread Matthias Klose
Control: tags -1 + wontfix Am 30.04.2014 00:04, schrieb Kurt Roeckx: > So reading about this, this might break glibc when you enable it > and they might need to build some files without it. Is this enabled by any other distributions? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.

Bug#746426: gcc: Enable -fasynchronous-unwind-tables on more arches.

2014-04-29 Thread Kurt Roeckx
So reading about this, this might break glibc when you enable it and they might need to build some files without it. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.

Bug#746426: gcc: Enable -fasynchronous-unwind-tables on more arches.

2014-04-29 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: gcc-4.9 Version: 4.9.0-1 Severity: wishlist Hi, It seems that not all arches have -fasynchronous-unwind-tables enabled. I see it enabled on amd64, i386, s390x, but disabled on armel/armhf, powerpc. Could this enable this on more architectures? I'm currently seeing elfutils test failur