Bug#633754: gcj-4.6: FTBFS on m68k with segfault

2012-01-27 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Comment #11 on the forwarded bug: Andreas Schwab 2012-01-23 13:05:35 UTC After r183426 this is now dormant on the 4.6 branch again. On the other hand, it happens on 4.7/trunk now. But it’s been brought to upstream’s attention, and with the next regular 4.6 branch pull we should get this workable

Bug#633754: gcj-4.6: FTBFS on m68k with segfault

2011-07-15 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Richard dixit: >what is "prev_insn"? (gdb) print prev_insn No symbol "prev_insn" in current context. Maybe this? (gdb) print previous_insn $4 = {rtx (rtx)} 0x801182c4 (gdb) print prev_real_insn $6 = {rtx (rtx)} 0x801184b4 (gdb) print prev_active_insn $7 = {rtx (rtx)} 0x801185ac (gdb) print p

Bug#633754: gcj-4.6: FTBFS on m68k with segfault

2011-07-15 Thread Richard
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 06:47:28PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Richard dixit: > > >equiv_constant is called with NULL pointer, I would think this is > >illegal and the problem happened one level up : > > Probably. > > (gdb) frame 1 > #1 0x804b0542 in fold_rtx (x=0xc83cb5f4, insn=0xc83cc1c0)

Bug#633754: gcj-4.6: FTBFS on m68k with segfault

2011-07-14 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Richard dixit: >equiv_constant is called with NULL pointer, I would think this is >illegal and the problem happened one level up : Probably. (gdb) frame 1 #1 0x804b0542 in fold_rtx (x=0xc83cb5f4, insn=0xc83cc1c0) at ../../src/gcc/cse.c:3274 3274const_arg = equiv_constant (folde

Bug#633754: gcj-4.6: FTBFS on m68k with segfault

2011-07-14 Thread Richard
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:30:17PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Source: gcj-4.6 > Version: 4.6.1-2 > Severity: serious > Justification: fails to build from source > > > Running with -v -save-temps then (still in the cowbuilder chroot): > > # gdb --args /tmp/buildd/gcj-4.6-4.6.1/build/./gcc/j

Bug#633754: gcj-4.6: FTBFS on m68k with segfault

2011-07-13 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Adam D. Barratt dixit: > This isn't RC. It's not a regression, and m68k isn't a release architecture in > any case. Sure. I just selected FTBFS severity in reportbug, but don’t disagree with that. bye, //mirabilos -- FWIW, I'm quite impressed with mksh interactively. I thought it was much *much

Processed: Re: Bug#633754: gcj-4.6: FTBFS on m68k with segfault

2011-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 633754 important Bug #633754 [src:gcj-4.6] gcj-4.6: FTBFS on m68k with segfault Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 633754: http://bugs.debian.org/c

Bug#633754: gcj-4.6: FTBFS on m68k with segfault

2011-07-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
severity 633754 important thanks On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:30:17 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Source: gcj-4.6 Version: 4.6.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Building (bootstrapping) gcj-4.6 fails after 3/4 days at: [...] (gcj-4.6 was never built on m68k before, but

Bug#633754: gcj-4.6: FTBFS on m68k with segfault

2011-07-13 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Source: gcj-4.6 Version: 4.6.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Building (bootstrapping) gcj-4.6 fails after 3/4 days at: /bin/bash ./libtool --tag=GCJ --mode=compile /tmp/buildd/gcj-4.6-4.6.1/build/./gcc/gcj -B/tmp/buildd/gcj-4.6-4.6.1/build/m68k-linux-gnu/m68040