> > > Since this is related to "gcc-dco-non-dfsg" infrastructure, I think
> > > this should be postponed until "FDL docs in gcc" is resolved. Which
> > > will probably happen only when gcc-4.3 enters unstable.
> >
> > Do you mean to imply that gcc 4.3 documentation will be licensed under
> > someth
> > Since this is related to "gcc-dco-non-dfsg" infrastructure, I think
> > this should be postponed until "FDL docs in gcc" is resolved. Which
> > will probably happen only when gcc-4.3 enters unstable.
>
> Do you mean to imply that gcc 4.3 documentation will be licensed under
> something other th
"Nikita V. Youshchenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since this is related to "gcc-dco-non-dfsg" infrastructure, I think this
> should be postponed until "FDL docs in gcc" is resolved. Which will
> probably happen only when gcc-4.3 enters unstable.
Do you mean to imply that gcc 4.3 documentatio
> Package: gfortran-doc
> Version: 4:4.1.1.nf3
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi,
>
> The version of gfortran-doc currently in Sid depends on the "real"
> package gfortran-4.1-doc. Since gfortran in Sid depends on
> gfortran-4.2, shouldn't gfortran-doc be similarly updated to depend on
> gfortran-4.2-do
Package: gfortran-doc
Version: 4:4.1.1.nf3
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
The version of gfortran-doc currently in Sid depends on the "real"
package gfortran-4.1-doc. Since gfortran in Sid depends on
gfortran-4.2, shouldn't gfortran-doc be similarly updated to depend on
gfortran-4.2-doc ?
best regards,
5 matches
Mail list logo
