* Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-19 20:46]:
> That is good to know. What I wanted to confirm is that the bug will be
> fixed in the gcc version used for that build as well, which happens to
> be 4.3-20080202-1. Therefore, I guess I can request a give back only
> after an upload of gcc-4
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 02:10:04PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-19 17:41]:
> > I have reason to believe that lam, which was uploaded to unstable to
> > use gfortran after this bug was found, is also affected by this bug,
> > from [1]. Could you confi
* Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-19 17:41]:
> I have reason to believe that lam, which was uploaded to unstable to
> use gfortran after this bug was found, is also affected by this bug,
> from [1]. Could you confirm that this is the case?
Definitely looks like it. The good news is tha
Dear GCC maintainers (and Martin in particular),
I have reason to believe that lam, which was uploaded to unstable to
use gfortran after this bug was found, is also affected by this bug,
from [1]. Could you confirm that this is the case?
Thank you.
Kumar
[1]:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi
4 matches
Mail list logo
