close 440489
thanks
Amir Tabatabaei writes:
> reopen 440489
> thanks
>
> This has not been solved and I see no reason why close it.
wrong; just read the comments:
> gcc-4.2 did never contain the doc files, so it cannot provide
> gcc-4.2-doc.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 440489
Bug#440489: Let gcc-doc depend on gcc-4.2-doc
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Amir Tabatabaei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Ple
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 440489
Bug#440489: Let gcc-doc depend on gcc-4.2-doc
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs databa
reopen 440489
thanks
This has not been solved and I see no reason why close it.
Regards,
Amir
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Amir Tabatabaei writes:
> > Hi Matthias,
> >
> > On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 01:43 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > Andreas Janssen writes:
> > > > Package: gcc-doc
> > > > Version: 4:4.1.1.nf3
> > > >
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > gcc-4.2 /suggests/ gcc-4.2-doc, but does not /provide/ that
> > > > pac
Amir Tabatabaei writes:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 01:43 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Andreas Janssen writes:
> > > Package: gcc-doc
> > > Version: 4:4.1.1.nf3
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > gcc-4.2 /suggests/ gcc-4.2-doc, but does not /provide/ that package.
> >
> > that's correc
Hi Matthias,
On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 01:43 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Andreas Janssen writes:
> > Package: gcc-doc
> > Version: 4:4.1.1.nf3
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > gcc-4.2 /suggests/ gcc-4.2-doc, but does not /provide/ that package.
>
> that's correct, gcc-4.2 does not include the doc files.
Why
Nikita V. Youshchenko writes:
> > > Currently, gcc-4.2-doc *is* in main. Does this mean that FDL paranoia
> > > has gone to past, or gcc-4.2-doc is in main just in error - I don't
> > > know. But depending on this, either non-free and contrib packages
> > > should be updated, or gcc-doc should be p
> > Currently, gcc-4.2-doc *is* in main. Does this mean that FDL paranoia
> > has gone to past, or gcc-4.2-doc is in main just in error - I don't
> > know. But depending on this, either non-free and contrib packages
> > should be updated, or gcc-doc should be provided by gcc-defaults (as
> > it was
Nikita V. Youshchenko writes:
>
> > Package: gcc-doc
> > Version: 4:4.1.1.nf3
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > gcc-4.2 /suggests/ gcc-4.2-doc, but does not /provide/ that package.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> LANG=C apt-cache policy gcc-4.2
> gcc-4.2:
> Installed: (none)
> Candidate: 4.2.1-4
> Version table:
> Package: gcc-doc
> Version: 4:4.1.1.nf3
>
> Hi
>
> gcc-4.2 /suggests/ gcc-4.2-doc, but does not /provide/ that package.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> LANG=C apt-cache policy gcc-4.2
gcc-4.2:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 4.2.1-4
Version table:
4.2.1-5 0
600 http://blacky unstable/main
Package: gcc-doc
Version: 4:4.1.1.nf3
Hi
gcc-4.2 /suggests/ gcc-4.2-doc, but does not /provide/ that package.
regards
Andreas Janssen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
12 matches
Mail list logo