Re: Bug#428582: xulrunner: please recheck with gcc-snapshot 20070613

2007-11-01 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 11:13:46AM +, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 07:37:59AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 03:33:31AM +, brian m. carlson <[EMAIL > > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > [CC'd to debian-mips.] > > > > > > > > On

Re: Bug#428582: xulrunner: please recheck with gcc-snapshot 20070613

2007-11-01 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Mike Hommey wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 07:37:59AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 03:33:31AM +, brian m. carlson <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > [CC'd to debian-mips.] > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:27:20PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > > > Steve Lan

Re: Bug#428582: xulrunner: please recheck with gcc-snapshot 20070613

2007-10-31 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 07:37:59AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 03:33:31AM +, brian m. carlson <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [CC'd to debian-mips.] > > > > On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:27:20PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > > Steve Langasek wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul

Re: Bug#428582: xulrunner: please recheck with gcc-snapshot 20070613

2007-09-10 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 03:33:31AM +, brian m. carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [CC'd to debian-mips.] > > On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:27:20PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > Steve Langasek wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:55:53PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 13, 20

Re: Bug#428582: xulrunner: please recheck with gcc-snapshot 20070613

2007-09-10 Thread brian m. carlson
[CC'd to debian-mips.] On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:27:20PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:55:53PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL > > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Please recheck wit

Re: Bug#428582: xulrunner: please recheck with gcc-snapshot 20070613

2007-07-06 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:55:53PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload. We may > > > miss another backport from the trunk. >

Re: Bug#428582: xulrunner: please recheck with gcc-snapshot 20070613

2007-07-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:55:53PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload. We may > > miss another backport from the trunk. > Did someone check already ? Pro

Re: Bug#428582: xulrunner: please recheck with gcc-snapshot 20070613

2007-07-05 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload. We may > miss another backport from the trunk. Did someone check already ? > Side note: gcc-snapshot currently cannot be built due to the too > stric

Re: Bug#428582: xulrunner: please recheck with gcc-snapshot 20070613

2007-06-28 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 12:56:26PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Anyways, changing this won't solve the problem with new xulrunner > > upstream releases... and the real problem is still on the ftp archive > > anyways... > > I very much doubt that for subsubminor version cha

Re: Bug#428582: xulrunner: please recheck with gcc-snapshot 20070613

2007-06-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Mike Hommey writes: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:21:37PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Mike Hommey writes: > > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:02:45PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL > > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Mike Hommey writes: > > > > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:4

Re: Bug#428582: xulrunner: please recheck with gcc-snapshot 20070613

2007-06-17 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 01:34:24PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-13 20:46]: > > Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload. We may > > miss another backport from the trunk. > FWIW, xulrunner currently doesn't build with gcc-snapshot

Re: Bug#428582: xulrunner: please recheck with gcc-snapshot 20070613

2007-06-13 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:21:37PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Hommey writes: > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:02:45PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Mike Hommey writes: > > > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL

Re: Bug#428582: xulrunner: please recheck with gcc-snapshot 20070613

2007-06-13 Thread Matthias Klose
Mike Hommey writes: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:02:45PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Mike Hommey writes: > > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL > > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload.

Re: Bug#428582: xulrunner: please recheck with gcc-snapshot 20070613

2007-06-13 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:02:45PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Hommey writes: > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload. We may > > > miss another backpo

Re: Bug#428582: xulrunner: please recheck with gcc-snapshot 20070613

2007-06-13 Thread Matthias Klose
Mike Hommey writes: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload. We may > > miss another backport from the trunk. > > > > Side note: gcc-snapshot currently cannot be built due to the too >

Re: Bug#428582: xulrunner: please recheck with gcc-snapshot 20070613

2007-06-13 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload. We may > miss another backport from the trunk. > > Side note: gcc-snapshot currently cannot be built due to the too > strict dependencies on the binar