* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-06 11:17]:
> * Frank Ch. Eigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-04 13:51]:
> > According to Roland McGrath, this is likely a bug in gcc rather than
> > elfutils. Would you mind redirecting the bug report in that
> > direction?
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
tags 376616 upstream
forwarded 376616 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28280
block 376895 by 376616
thanks
* Eugeniy Meshcheryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-05 17:53]:
> I can reproduce this bug with attached file (test.c):
Thanks a lot for the testcase. I've been travelling and haven't had
time to look
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 376616 upstream
Bug#376616: FTBFS with GCC 4.2: warning: statement with no effect
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> forwarded 376616 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28280
Bug#376616: FTBFS with GCC 4.2: warning: statement with no effect
* Frank Ch. Eigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-04 13:51]:
> According to Roland McGrath, this is likely a bug in gcc rather than
> elfutils. Would you mind redirecting the bug report in that
> direction?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28280
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.co
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 376616 -1
Bug#376616: FTBFS with GCC 4.2: warning: statement with no effect
Bug 376616 cloned as bug 376895.
> reassign 376616 gcc-snapshot 20060626-1
Bug#376616: FTBFS with GCC 4.2: warning: statement with no effect
Bug reassigned from p
5 matches
Mail list logo