Bug#361715: Log for failed build of barrage_1.0.2-1

2006-04-10 Thread Falk Hueffner
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yeah, I had an old file around that delta used instead. Below is a > new test case. Falk, do you see this segfault? Nope... -- Falk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Bug#361715: Log for failed build of barrage_1.0.2-1

2006-04-10 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-09 22:31]: > I also get a segfaul with barrage_1.0.2-1. Unless I made a mistake, > delta reduced it to the same test case as for pari_2.1.7-2 so I assume > they are the same bug. Yeah, I had an old file around that delta used instead. Below is a ne

Bug#361715: Log for failed build of barrage_1.0.2-1

2006-04-09 Thread Martin Michlmayr
I also get a segfaul with barrage_1.0.2-1. Unless I made a mistake, delta reduced it to the same test case as for pari_2.1.7-2 so I assume they are the same bug. I've attached the preprocessed source just in case. > Automatic build of barrage_1.0.2-1 on em64t by sbuild/amd64 1.112 ... > gcc -DHA