On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 01:05:11AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Grant, thank you for your work to date on this bug. (BTW, it would be
> helpful if you would follow up to bug #342545 on libgcc2, instead of bug
> #341675 which is filed against just one of the many packages affected by
> it).
Stev
Grant, thank you for your work to date on this bug. (BTW, it would be
helpful if you would follow up to bug #342545 on libgcc2, instead of bug
#341675 which is filed against just one of the many packages affected by
it).
Unfortunately, it doesn't seem from the bug log as though much progress is
b
[cc:ed to the hppa porters individually, as well as to debian-hppa; please
let me know if you prefer to get such mail just via the list in the future.]
Are the hppa porters aware of bug #342545 in libgcc2, which is affecting
builds of most Qt-related packages on hppa today? I had suggested to LaM
3 matches
Mail list logo
