In my case, I don't really want to debug gcc, but I want to make an
upstream bug report as precise as possible. So including a stack
trace would be a bonus. It should help narrowing the nature of the
bug, so that the appriopriate upstream author can start
investigating, thus saving them time.
Hi,
Daniel Bonniot wrote:
In my case, I don't really want to debug gcc, but I want to make an
upstream bug report as precise as possible. So including a stack trace
would be a bonus. It should help narrowing the nature of the bug, so
that the appriopriate upstream author can start investigating,
On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 07:42:19AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> > On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 12:51:41PM +0200, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for your prompt answer.
> > >
> > > >yes, space & bandwidth. the packages get 100%-200% bigger. and if you
> > > >real
Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 12:51:41PM +0200, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for your prompt answer.
> >
> > >yes, space & bandwidth. the packages get 100%-200% bigger. and if you
> > >really want to debug gcc, you need the source and you build it
> > >yourself. gcc-
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 12:51:41PM +0200, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
>
> Thanks for your prompt answer.
>
> >yes, space & bandwidth. the packages get 100%-200% bigger. and if you
> >really want to debug gcc, you need the source and you build it
> >yourself. gcc-snapshot is intended to check for bugs i
Thanks for your prompt answer.
yes, space & bandwidth. the packages get 100%-200% bigger. and if you
really want to debug gcc, you need the source and you build it
yourself. gcc-snapshot is intended to check for bugs in development
versions of gcc, such that package maintainers can have it installe
Package: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20040613-1
Severity: wishlist
Since this snapshot is especially usefull for debugging recent versions
of gcc, it would seem to me a good idea not to strip the executables,
but to keep as much debugging symbols as possible. Is there a compelling
reason not to do t
7 matches
Mail list logo
