Bug#202927: gcc-3.3: Link order on Sparc: system directories vs specified directories

2003-07-26 Thread Ben Collins
On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 09:37:28AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Ben, I think, this is the same as #202924, introduced by the > sparc64-build patch. Is there a reason that -Y P,/usr/lib is replaced > with -L/usr/lib ? I can't remember why I had done that, but feel free to revert it. -- Debian

Bug#202927: gcc-3.3: Link order on Sparc: system directories vs specified directories

2003-07-26 Thread Matthias Klose
Ben, I think, this is the same as #202924, introduced by the sparc64-build patch. Is there a reason that -Y P,/usr/lib is replaced with -L/usr/lib ? --- sparc64-build.gcc-3.3.tmp/src/gcc/config/sparc/linux64.h2003-03-13 08:40:33.0 + +++ sparc64-build.gcc-3.3/src/gcc/config/sparc/

Bug#202927: gcc-3.3: Link order on Sparc: system directories vs specified directories

2003-07-26 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Package: gcc-3.3 Version: 1:3.3.1-0pre0 Severity: normal Hello, I remarked a problem with gcc on Sparc which concerns the linking order of libraries. I have done a simple test to show that: First foo.c: <---> void foo() { } <---> Second file, main.c: <---> int main() { foo(); return 0; }