Bug#197090: gcj-3.3: babel fails with 3.3, works with 3.2...

2003-06-19 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 09:11, Tom Tromey wrote: > > "Matthias" == Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Matthias> This report is very vague. Should it be submitted to bugzilla > anyway? > > Could you get more info first? > Ideally the reporter could find out exactly what goes wrong.

Bug#197090: gcj-3.3: babel fails with 3.3, works with 3.2...

2003-06-13 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Matthias" == Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Matthias> This report is very vague. Should it be submitted to bugzilla anyway? Could you get more info first? Ideally the reporter could find out exactly what goes wrong. Tom

Bug#197090: gcj-3.3: babel fails with 3.3, works with 3.2...

2003-06-13 Thread Matthias Klose
This report is very vague. Should it be submitted to bugzilla anyway? Adam C Powell IV writes: > Package: gcj-3.3 > Version: 1:3.3-3 > Severity: normal > > Hello, > > Okay, so this is kind of a vague bug at this point, but here's what I > know: with gcj-3.2 installed, babel compiles and runs jus

Bug#197090: gcj-3.3: babel fails with 3.3, works with 3.2...

2003-06-11 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Package: gcj-3.3 Version: 1:3.3-3 Severity: normal Hello, Okay, so this is kind of a vague bug at this point, but here's what I know: with gcj-3.2 installed, babel compiles and runs just fine; with gcj-3.3, it compiles but fails at runtime using kaffe. Here's the runtime error: /usr/bin/java -a