Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 2002-06-01 at 18:49, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> From gcc.gnu.org: "please note that the integration of the Ada front
>> end is still work in progress."
>
> Just curious, where does it say that? I looked at
> http://gcc.gnu.org/>, and couldn't find it.
On Sat, 2002-06-01 at 18:49, Matthias Klose wrote:
> From gcc.gnu.org: "please note that the integration of the Ada front
> end is still work in progress."
Just curious, where does it say that? I looked at
http://gcc.gnu.org/>, and couldn't find it.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUB
On Sun, 2002-06-02 at 21:38, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> The GNAT compiler based on GCC 2.8.1 is a top quality compiler. There
> are some glitches in the GCC 3.1 port though.
I'm not sure what you mean here; Are you suggesting it might be easier
to fix the bugs in the gcc 2.8.1 based version then in 3
On Sun, 2002-06-02 at 18:27, Matthias Klose wrote:
> please use gccbug-3.1 for submitting the report (category ada) and
>
> - mention that it has been forwarded from the Debian BTS
> - use the bug address as submitter address,
> - use the gnats-CC for the address of the submitter
>
> or use the
On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 10:37, Brian May wrote:
> It looks OK, but all it does is copy the input to the output (aux was
> created by renaming ada.numerics.aux to aux):
On second thoughts, no it doesn't!
(Dislaimer: I don't really know what these opcodes stand for, so I am
guessing)
The code in que
On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 09:28, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> No. You can check that your assembler has been properly included by
> looking at the resulting assembly code (gcc-3.1 -S -o - testbug2.adb).
Curious.
It looks OK, but all it does is copy the input to the output (aux was
created by renaming ada.
On 3/06, Brian May wrote:
| However, when I copied the routine to my code, it instantly stopped
| working at all (it turned the Asm call into a NOP), and I half suspected
| at the time that maybe I was doing something wrong (do I need to use a
| special compiler flag or something to get Asm code
On Sun, 2002-06-02 at 21:38, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> The package System.Img_Real is used to convert floats to string. You
> can look at the expanded GNAT output using:
>
> % gcc-3.1 -gnatds testbug2.adb
Thanks for that tip. Will try it latter.
> Well, it looks like it is a i386 specific problem,
> "Brian" == Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brian> raised CONSTRAINT_ERROR : s-imgrea.adb:236
Brian> (which is funny in a way, I don't see where this function is
Brian> getting called)
The package System.Img_Real is used to convert floats to string. You
can look at the expanded GNAT o
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What is the upstream address?
Please read http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html . Submitting bugs via GNATS
(mind the "S" ;-) is the preferred method.
--
Florian Weimer[EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of Stuttgart http://CERT.Uni-Stuttgar
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 2002-06-01 at 18:49, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> From gcc.gnu.org: "please note that the integration of the Ada front
>> end is still work in progress."
>
> Ok. I thought I heard rumors of something like this.
No, we told you this on debian-devel. An
On Sat, 2002-06-01 at 18:49, Matthias Klose wrote:
> From gcc.gnu.org: "please note that the integration of the Ada front
> end is still work in progress."
Ok. I thought I heard rumors of something like this.
> However, the gcc package "inherited" the gnat package and we currently
> don't have a
Brian May writes:
> Is the quality of the Gnat compiler likely to improve any time in the
> not-too-distant future, or should I be concentrating my efforts for the
> moment at least on other languages?
>From gcc.gnu.org: "please note that the integration of the Ada front
end is still work in progr
Package: gnat-3.1
Version: 1:3.1-2
Followup-For: Bug #148529
The following code is the same as before, except with 2 extra lines:
--- CUT ---
with Ada.Text_IO;
use Ada.Text_IO;
with Ada.Numerics;
use Ada.Numerics;
with Ada.Numerics.Generic_Elementary_Functions;
procedure TestBug2 is
typ
14 matches
Mail list logo