On Fri, 2002-02-15 at 11:41, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 11:23:00AM +, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > > should be more like
> > > arm-gnu-source because the patch is named arm-gnu-source.dpatch.
> >
> > Can you make a binary-only upload with that change? I don't think it's
>
>
hi,
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 11:23:00AM +, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > should be more like
> > arm-gnu-source because the patch is named arm-gnu-source.dpatch.
>
> Can you make a binary-only upload with that change? I don't think it's
sure. should i add an entry in the changelog, probably, what
On Fri, 2002-02-15 at 08:42, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> you have a small typo in the arm specific section of rules.patch.
>
> you wrote
>
> ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),arm)
> debian_patches += arm-const-double arm-tune arm-gnus-source
> endif
>
> should be more like
>
> arm-gnu-source because the pat
Package: gcc-3.0
Version: 1:3.0.4ds2-0pre020210
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi,
you have a small typo in the arm specific section of rules.patch.
you wrote
ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),arm)
debian_patches += arm-const-double arm-tune arm-gnus-source
endif
should be more like
arm-gnu-source beca
4 matches
Mail list logo