Bug#130394: [ARM] gcc misunhandle % with unsigned long operands

2002-02-15 Thread Phil Blundell
reassign 130394 gcc-2.95 severity 130394 important forwarded 130394 [EMAIL PROTECTED] tags 130394 + patch tags 130394 + upstream tags 130394 + fixed retitle 130394 [PR 5700] [ARM; fixed in 3.0] bug in __umodsi3 thanks The reason this one didn't show up with a cross-compiler is that the bug is in t

Bug#130394: ARM] gcc misunhandle % with unsigned long operands

2002-01-28 Thread Bill Allombert
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 03:31:35PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > tags 130394 + potato I suppose that mean you have tested and it works ? Then see below. > please could you recheck with current compilers in testing/unstable? Not until debussy is up again, because I have no account on a arm outsid

Processed: Re: Bug#130394: [ARM] gcc misunhandle % with unsigned long operands

2002-01-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 130394 + potato Bug#130394: [ARM] gcc misunhandle % with unsigned long operands Tags added: potato > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debia

Bug#130394: ARM] gcc misunhandle % with unsigned long operands

2002-01-28 Thread Matthias Klose
tags 130394 + potato thanks please could you recheck with current compilers in testing/unstable?

Bug#130394: [ARM] gcc misunhandle % with unsigned long operands

2002-01-22 Thread Bill Allombert
Package: gcc Version: 1:2.95.2-13.1 Severity: normal Hello, The following program is miscompiled by gcc on debussy.debian.org : --- typedef unsigned long ulong; main() { ulong x=3221225472UL; ulong y=2UL; printf("x%y=%lu\n",(ulong)(x%y)); } --- ./a.out x%y=1073741824 inst