Re: Bug#115353: gcc: cc & gcc should use update-alternatives mechanism

2001-10-14 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
> > 'preferred' by whom? I think that this should be controlled by > > sysadmin. The whole 'alternatives' system for making easy > > for sysadmin to change defaults. Why gcc is exception? > > ld and as are exceptions as well. > > use the system compiler to build libfoo, change the system com

Bug#115353: gcc: cc & gcc should use update-alternatives mechanism

2001-10-14 Thread Matthias Klose
marko writes: > On Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 10:26:37AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > marko writes: > > > As in subject: I think that cc and gcc should be provided > > > through update-alternatives mechanism, so user could > > > switch between gcc272, gcc-2.95 and gcc-3.0 more easily. > > > > > > Eg

Bug#115353: gcc: cc & gcc should use update-alternatives mechanism

2001-10-14 Thread marko
On Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 10:26:37AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > marko writes: > > As in subject: I think that cc and gcc should be provided > > through update-alternatives mechanism, so user could > > switch between gcc272, gcc-2.95 and gcc-3.0 more easily. > > > > Eg. use gcc-3.0 for cc but gcc

Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#115353: gcc: cc & gcc should use update-alternatives mechanism

2001-10-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 112887 gcc Bug#112887: gcc in alternatives? Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.0' to `gcc'. > merge 115353 112887 Bug#112887: gcc in alternatives? Bug#115353: gcc: cc & gcc should use update-alternatives mechanism

Bug#115353: gcc: cc & gcc should use update-alternatives mechanism

2001-10-14 Thread Matthias Klose
tags 115353 + wontfix merge 115353 112887 thanks marko writes: > Package: gcc > Version: 2:2.95.4-6 > Severity: wishlist > > As in subject: I think that cc and gcc should be provided > through update-alternatives mechanism, so user could > switch between gcc272, gcc-2.95 and gcc-3.0 more easily.

Processed: Re: Bug#115353: gcc: cc & gcc should use update-alternatives mechanism

2001-10-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 115353 + wontfix Bug#115353: gcc: cc & gcc should use update-alternatives mechanism Tags added: wontfix > merge 115353 112887 Bug#112887: gcc in alternatives? Bug#115353: gcc: cc & gcc should use update-alternatives mechanism Mismat

Bug#115353: gcc: cc & gcc should use update-alternatives mechanism

2001-10-12 Thread marko
Package: gcc Version: 2:2.95.4-6 Severity: wishlist As in subject: I think that cc and gcc should be provided through update-alternatives mechanism, so user could switch between gcc272, gcc-2.95 and gcc-3.0 more easily. Eg. use gcc-3.0 for cc but gcc-2.95 for gcc or whatever... -- System Informa