PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11366
--- Additional Comments From sirl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-14 19:14
---
I have no other idea then, 4.2 already had -fno-merge-constants and I can't
thi
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11366
--- Additional Comments From sirl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-14 18:17
---
Out of interest, since you are still using XFree86-4.2.1, have you made sure
you compiled
At 08:57 24.01.2003, Matthias Klose wrote:
Benjamin Kosnik writes:
> On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 11:25:04 +0100
> Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Is it likely this will be addressed in the gcc-3.2 branch?
>
> Are you volunteering?
Ryan Murray provided a patch, which I attach here. Needed for
Synopsis: [3.2 regression] loop unroll bug with -march=k6-3
State-Changed-From-To: closed->open
State-Changed-By: sirl
State-Changed-When: Thu Nov 28 04:29:32 2002
State-Changed-Why:
Reopen, backported fix From Dale causes a regression on powerpc-linux-gnu.
The testcase gcc.c-tort
Synopsis: ICE in merge_blocks_move_predecessor_nojumps, at cfgcleanup.c:650
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: sirl
State-Changed-When: Sat Nov 16 03:33:32 2002
State-Changed-Why:
see <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2002-11/msg00708.html>.
Current gcc-3_2-
At 13:43 10.12.2001, Alan Modra wrote:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 11:57:12AM +0100, Franz Sirl wrote:
>
> No, that isn't the problem, Alan Modra broke it with his "obvious"
patch ;-).
Oops, sorry. I should have pressed harder to move the simplified (and
corrected!) 3.1 rs600
At 07:44 10.12.2001, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 07:37:45AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> [CC to Franz]
>
> Dan, I missed to include the libgcc-powerpc patch (in rules.patch)
> from Franz Sirl:
>
> "as recently noted, for --enabled-shared --disable-m
7 matches
Mail list logo
