--- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-09-16 17:15
---
Thanks Jakub.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45691
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--
To
--- Comment #26 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-04-06 11:22
---
Let's just close it as fixed.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-04-06 11:00
---
Jon is right and recently I removed that old comment from random.h because
indeed was incorrect.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #22 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-02-17 09:36
---
So... shall we close this as fixed?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42460
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
--
To
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkoz at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #12 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-20 14:00
---
Ok, let's re-open to be safe: please provide as soon as possible to Benjamin
the information he needs...
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Re
--- Comment #10 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-20 13:12
---
Ok, let's close this one as fixed...
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4,.5 Regression] ICE in|[4.5 Regression] ICE in
|gimple_op, at
--- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-12 12:49
---
As usual, please reduce these beasts...
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-09 19:07
---
Oops, sorry, I stand corrected, needed some sleep... indeed, that reminds me...
other/42230 !! ;)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42670
--- You are receiving this mail because
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-09 10:19
---
c++filt is part of binutils and indeed the PR is about binutils, thus doesn't
belong here. If you have strong reasons to believe GCC is at fault, please
explain and reopen.
--
paolo dot carlini at o
--- Comment #7 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-08 18:47
---
*** Bug 39243 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-08 18:47
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 16006 ***
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo dot carlini at oracle
--- Comment #7 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-06 16:39
---
Ok, thanks. Can you summarize the present status, then? Outstanding issues,
maybe more patchlets... ;)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42460
--- You are receiving this mail because
--- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-06 11:41
---
Done both.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42460
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
--- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-12-30 12:51
---
*** Bug 42552 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-12-30 12:51
---
If you are looking for a totally unsupported (can go away at any moment)
"workaround" (it's a bug that it does what you want), see PR11705
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 37557 *
--- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-12-30 02:01
---
Matthias, sorry, please apply only the first hunk, I'm applying momentarily the
patch from Ed fixing the second issue.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42460
--- You are receiving
--- Comment #21 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-12-30 01:25
---
Done (I'm trusting you blindly)
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-12-30 01:21
---
Matthias, please apply your doc patchlet, thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42460
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the
--- Comment #9 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-12-26 11:03
---
I understand can be closed as fixed now.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|paolo dot carlini at oracle |
|dot com |
http
--
Bug 41101 depends on bug 41316, which changed state.
Bug 41316 Summary: [C++0x] forward_list::sort violates strict aliasing rules
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41316
What|Old Value |New Value
--- Comment #6 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-07-24 10:42
---
Closing...
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-06-22 14:43
---
Indeed, is correct per the current C++ standard at least. I also remember to
have certainly closed similar issues in the past, but I'm too lazy to find one
to mark as duplicate ;)
--
paolo dot carli
--- Comment #9 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-05-22 20:30
---
Two general comments: 1- Patches should be in any case posted to the
gcc-patches mailing list; 2- I got previous feedbacks from Joseph as meaning
that the issue is general, not restricted to the arm config; 3
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-05-13 18:42
---
To be clear, due to PR40134, the patch mentioned has been reverted for now.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-05-13 18:42
---
To be clear, due to PR40134, the patch mentioned has been reverted for now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40133
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug
--- Comment #6 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-05-06 13:20
---
Excellent. Then Matthias' suggested fix makes sense to me. Better if Benjamin
could also review it, however (lately, he touched this code, IIRC).
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com ch
--- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-05-06 11:25
---
Benjamin, can you have a look?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40038
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
--
To
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40038
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-05-06 11:02
---
By the way, if you want to hear my advice, remember to regression test on those
much less widespread targets *before* major releases.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40038
--- You are
--- Comment #34 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-05-06 09:19
---
Removing 4.2 regression, branch no longer maintained.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-05-06 09:17
---
Is this related to PR39491?
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39491
--- Comment #14 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-01-07 12:23
---
Hi. Definitely, I like the first approach better. Jakub, are you willing to
work on it? Honestly, because I don't think it's the right time to play with
ABI issues, I'm ready to revert comple
--- Comment #30 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-08-19 17:52
---
Yes, this can be considered fixed.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
38 matches
Mail list logo
