rld');
WriteLn
END hello.
$ gm2 -fiso hello.mod -o hello
$ ./hello
hello world
It seems that libm2pim.so lacks some necessary functions which
libm2iso.so has.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
for all other packages affected?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:50:04 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
this might be a bad merge/update; Ludovic, Nicolas, could you have a
look? GCC 6 likely has the same issue.
Will do.
--
Ludovic.
ir own. We don't want to
require users to type gnatmake-x.y instead of gnatmake; and there is a
whole bunch of user-facing programs that call each other, too, like
gnatls, gprbuild, etc.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
.]
> Am I missing something about debian versions VS upstream?
Yes, Debian tracks the release branch gcc-5-branch as opposed to trunk.
HTH
--
Ludovic Brenta.
lationship between gcc and debian-gcc ?
How can I do a contribution to debian-gcc ?
Thank you!
mudongliang
In case you are not subscribed to the debian-gcc list to which you
post, please read my answer to your first post:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2015/04/msg00112.html
--
Ludovic Brent
s, so the
addresses are unpredictable and cannot be used to write malware.
This is probably documented in the sources of glibc but first,
see malloc(3) and mallopt(3) (e.g. "man malloc" and "man mallopt" on
the command line).
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
freeze exception
request (#774221) which, if and when granted, will break the
build-dependency of gnat-4.9 in testing and require that gnat-4.9 also
migrate from unstable to testing; I commented to that effect in the
request.
So, this bug is technically closed but might resurface in the near
f
ttp://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/gcccvs/branches/sid/gcc-4.9/
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87y4r0sx21@ludovic-brenta.org
3:22:59.709708557
+0800
@@ -0,0 +1,146 @@
+# Configure script for libada.
+# Copyright 2003, 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debia
Matthias Klose writes:
> known. please wait for the gcc-4.9 4.9.2-2 upload before syncing.
OK. Are you planning to request a freeze exception so that 4.9.2 goes
into jessie?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "uns
I
made libgnatvsn use $(FULLVER) as well for consistency.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87k33tfaqq@ludovic-brenta.org
I have committed a proposed change to gcc-base-version.diff as revision
7691. I will try to experiment with this and gnat-4.9 when I have time
and will not upload before doko approves of this change.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
ge the
directories where various pieces of GCC are installed,
e.g. /usr/lib/gcc/$(target)/4.6.1 to /usr/lib/gcc/$(target)/4.6
(changing BASEVER from 4.6.1 to 4.6). At the same time, this patch
introduced FULLVER (value: 4.6.1). I am not sure why FULLVER is needed
at all nowadays. Why not remove F
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort writes:
> On 21/09/14 02:31, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
>> Nicolas Boulenguez writes:
>>> A bootstrap issue will remain: building a new gnat-4.9 package
>>> installing these symlinks requires a working compiler.
>>
>> I am now uploa
ed
the symlinks manually, so that gnat-4.9 4.9.1-1 worked again as the
bootstrap compiler.
Since this is a policy violation (official packages must be built on
real hardware, not on virtual machines) I intend to upload -3 to have it
rebuilt on kfreebsd-i386 with -2.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUB
ebsd-i386). I propose to
use #761248 (severity important) to track the issue on hurd-i386, if
it is different.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian
Andrey Gursky writes:
> While gcc 4.8.2 has been updated to 4.8.3, gnat-4.8 has gone except
> gnat-4.8-doc [1].
Correct. gnat-4.8-doc should go, too. You should use gnat-4.9 instead.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subj
, gettext,
+ gdb (>= 7.6.2-1.1),
texinfo (>= 4.3), locales, sharutils,
procps, FORTRAN_BUILD_DEP JAVA_BUILD_DEP GNAT_BUILD_DEP GO_BUILD_DEP
GDC_BUILD_DEP
CLOOG_BUILD_DEP MPC_BUILD_DEP MPFR_BUILD_DEP GMP_BUILD_DEP
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
tags 749869 pending
thanks
I have moved the offending file to the architecture-dependent package
gnat-4.9. This mirrors a similar arrangement in gcc-4.9 and
gcc-4.9-base.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubs
run the program.
If you compile with -gnatpg, you get no warning and the program runs and
prints:
False
False
Well, gnatlink.adb contains such a construct at line 2195. Upstream
compiles gnatlink.adb with -gnatpg and Debian compiles it without
-gnatpg, thereby forcing conformance with Ada seman
> gdb-gnatlink <From: Ludovic Brenta
Forwarded: no
Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/749574
Description: Constraint_Error, range check failed at gnatlink.adb:2195, when called from gnatmake with -D option
The procedure gnatlink assumes that the Linker_Options.Table contains access
values to s
not commit with upstream to
maintain this patch, if I should submit it.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/1b5797364afae16937f3
I have requested removal of gnat-4.8 from the archive; can you tell me
if this bug is still presend in gnat-4.9?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arch
I have requested removal of gnat-4.8 from the archive; can you tell me
if this bug is still presend in gnat-4.9?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arch
I have requested removal of gnat-4.8 from the archive; can you tell me
if this bug is still presend in gnat-4.9? IIUC, upstream has improved
support for arm in this new release.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubs
I have requested removal of gnat-4.8 from the archive. Can you please
tell me whether this bug is still present in gnat-4.9?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.
On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 15:37:38 +0100, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
Matthias Klose wrote:
Please don't break GCC snapshot builds by not applying needed
patches for the snapshot builds. At least the ppc64el build is
broken, now fixed in the vcs. I didn't check other targets like,
arm, mips, th
plied only on snapshot builds? Perhaps the problem is with this
other patch, then?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/13759b0c1
Everything looks fine on amd64 but the bug was reported on mips64el.
Perhaps there is a discrepancy between architectures?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.o
#x27;
make[2]: *** [bootstrap] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build'
Note that none of these exceptions are raised when using
the bootstrap compiler (gnat-4.6) to compile a-except.adb.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.o
dhere to
POSIX in this respect as it defines "long" to be 32-bit but uses a
64-bit value for timespec.tv_nsec. You cannot change that but you can
try to support all architectures in a clean way as Arno suggested.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.de
part of
s-osinte-kfreebsd-gnu.ads.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/3c1bfa3e3388f2840b2d37563dec1...@ludovic-brenta.org
Ludovic Brenta writes:
> Svante Signell writes:
>> Ping, adding this bug report to debian-ada too. Who is Ada upstream?
>
> Patience. I'm waiting for Matthias to upload a newer gcc-4.9-source
> containing the fix for your bug #740153, then I will upload a gnat-4.9
> i
chitecture that supports only one
mechanism (all current architectures do support both, now). But it
would simplify the Debian build machinery quite a bit.
> Also is there any progress in upstreaming the libgnatproj* additions?
No progress so far, sorry.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
, Xavier, do you have any comments on this specific bug?
In particular, how do you think Svante's change might affect
GNU/kFreeBSD?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@l
e these build-dependencies
are
from the GCC sources. doko, can you shed some light on this?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
h
sources. Feel free to revert that change if necessary.
Also, the three patches:
ada-s-osinte-gnu.adb.diff
ada-s-taprop-gnu.adb.diff
gcc_ada_gcc-interface_Makefile.in.diff
are now merged into a single patch, ada-hurd.diff, which is applied on
all architectures if Ada is enabled.
--
Ludovic
patches into gcc-4.9. It's unfortunate that this doesn't happen on a
> regular basis. Ludovic, any update on this?
Yes, that's unfortunate and a consequence of my limited available time.
I'm back from a week of skiing, catching up on my 300+ emails and I will
try to m
ng compiled, either).
Ideally we could get rid of "debian/rules unpack" entirely and simplify
the code base of Debian packaging. The fixed set of patches,
i.e. debian/patches/series, would also simplify debian/rules.patch quite
a bit.
Ideas, objections?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To U
Matthias Klose writes:
> Am 25.04.2013 23:17, schrieb Ludovic Brenta:
>>> Ludovic, seen that the gnat-4.7 and gnat-4.8 uploads did wait in NEW
>>> for the last three months, please could you make these available on
>>> people.debian.org too?
>>
>> Done,
hich requires manual editing of
>> the override file. It is ok otherwise, so please be patient. New
>> packages are usually added to the override file about once a week.
>
> Ludovic, seen that the gnat-4.7 and gnat-4.8 uploads did wait in NEW
> for the last three months, please
ith GPS, and using libgnatvsn.
Only changes to the GCC build machinery are necessary to produce these
two libraries.
If you're going to attend FOSDEM, I suggest we meet to discuss this in
more detail.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
packages, such that a new upload of gcc-x.y
does not change gcc-x.y-source? For one thing, it would avoid wasting
bandwidth re-uploading the upstream tarball with each upload of
gcc-x.y.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of &q
pplying that to
GCC would remove one Debian-specific patch. Eric, could you please
have a look at it? I don't think I can find the time to re-submit
this patch against 4.8 until January.
[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg00594.html
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Tobias Hansen writes:
> Am 06.12.2012 20:57, schrieb Tobias Hansen:
>> Am 06.12.2012 20:44, schrieb Ludovic Brenta:
>>> Tobias Hansen writes:
>>>> since we have gnat-4.6 in wheezy and gnat-4.4 does not build anymore
>>>> (see #669513), can gnat-4.4 be
val of gnat-4.4 sthus far.
Thanks for your time and concern
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87k3svdkyk@ludovic-brenta.org
*shared*
libaws.so.2.10.2 against the *shared* libgnarl-4.6.so.1.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/2592c8605c52786ccc2596ae3b308...@ludovic-brenta.org
ready done the work and there is now more commonality with
the other languages, then keep the split.
Thanks for your time and contribution!
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas..
h that the
latter is closer to the truth :/
Thanks for the bug report.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/fc6ac9acf769e34a324c
reassign 683004 src:gcc-4.6
severity 683004 important
forcemerge 683004 637236
affects 637236 + src:gcj-4.6
thanks
Duplicate bug report, this time affecting gcj-4.6.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
reassign 623382 gnat 4.4+1
close 623382 gnat/4.4+1.1
thanks
This bug was, in fact, in gnat rather than gnat-4.4. If has been fixed
and closed for several months and I wonder why you followed up on this
bug. Perhaps it is not properly marked as closed; I'm attempting to fix
that.
--
Lu
directory (one for each tool to build). The
various
gnatmake processes step on each other's toes. The fix is to run the
gnatmake processes sequentially but pass the parallel option to each of
them, so they can run parallel compilations as needed.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
n of
the library. Should the test not be, simply, "ifeq
($(with_libcxx),yes)"?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87397zmhwp@ludovic-brenta.org
This upload does not seem to correspond to any revision in Subversion.
The latest revision (r5970) starts with:
gcc-4.6 (4.6.3-4) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
Are there any other changes in this upload besides those in r5970?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
> Changes:
> gcc-4.6 (4.6.3-4) unstable; urgen
retitle 247020 [Fixed in 4.7] Illegal program not detected, self
renames
thanks
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.
rename 247020 [Fixed in 4.7] Illegal program not detected, self renames
thanks
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.
, at tree-inline.c:1853 |
| Error detected around
/build/buildd-gnat-gps_5.0-2-armel-1dgOLi/gnat-gps-5.0/ada_module/core/src/ada_semantic_tree-units.adb:461:23|
I'll apply the same workaround as in libtemplates-parser.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
e.
* types.ads: Remove storage size clauses from big types (since we may
need to do deallocations, which are now illegal for empty pools).
So I think that backporting the entire commit (affecting exp_intr.adb,
sem_intr.adb, sinput.adb and most importantly types.ads) to gnat-4.4
should
Julien Cristau writes:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 23:43:03 +0100, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
>
>> doko, you said merging gcc-4.6 4.6.2-4 into gnat-4.6 would fix this
>> FTBFS but it hasn't. The buildd log does not indicate the exact version
>> of gcc-4.6 installed on
Julien Cristau writes:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 23:32:48 +0100, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
>
>> retitle 649307 FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64: gengtype: Internal error: abort in
>> get_output_file_with_visibility, at gengtype.c:1998
>> reassign 649307 src:gcc-4.6
>> severity
Do you have any other suggestions? Should an ARM porter have a look?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87hb1zvimg@ludovic-brenta.org
-4.6 or gnat-4.6. We monitor the buildds and are aware of
FTBFS, so these bugs are not useful for us and only take away some of
our precious time for triaging. Thanks.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
e package FTBFS on fano (the kfreebsd-amd64 buildd).
>>
>> As Matthias is travelling, I'll try to upload 4.6.1-3 this weekend.
>
> Cool, thanks!
The build on fano failed again despite using only one job :(
At this point I'll have to leave it to kFreeBSD porters to find
EB_BUILD_OPTIONS
NJOBS := -j $(subst parallel=,,$(filter parallel=%,$(subst $(COMMA),
,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS
endif
The package FTBFS on fano (the kfreebsd-amd64 buildd).
As Matthias is travelling, I'll try to upload 4.6.1-3 this weekend.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6.1 -> 4.6. Do you have
any objection against reintroducing these symlinks?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lis
Disabling inlining (i.e. removing -gnatn from the compiler options)
works around the bug.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.
retitle 642981 gnat-4.6: ICE in update_ssa_across_abnormal_edges, at
tree-inline.c:1853
thanks
This bug exists even with -O1 and -O0, it is not in the optimizer.
Investigation continues.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
This bug is in the optimizer. Compiling with -O0 avoids it; -O1 and
-O2 both trigger the bug.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.
esponding bug is already
open against ld.
[1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2011-09/msg00128.html
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
severity 635126 important
thanks
Downgrading this bug as an easy workaround has been found. This will
allow gcc-4.6 to migrate to testing.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
.
I would very much like to understand the changes on both buildd
machines that allow the package to build, or cause it to FTBFS.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.
tags 642128 sid pending
thanks
I think I have a solution for this problem. As it turns out,
GNU/kFreeBSD does not support these optional parts of POSIX threads
whereas FreeBSD does. I'll upload within 48 hours.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc
parser-filter.adb:824:15|
[...]
raised TYPES.UNRECOVERABLE_ERROR : comperr.adb:423
gnatmake:
"/build/buildd-libtemplates-parser_11.6-1-armel-7ATaJo/libtemplates-parser-11.6/src/templates_parser.adb"
compilation error
make[1]: *** [build] Error 4
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
/asis/asis-text.adb:1069:1|
[...]
raised TYPES.UNRECOVERABLE_ERROR : comperr.adb:423
gnatmake:
"/build/buildd-asis_2010-2-kfreebsd-amd64-k7wLVQ/asis-2010/asis/asis-text.adb"
compilation error
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
ld log is available from:
>
> http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011-09-02/gnat-4.4_4.4.6-5_lsid64.buildlog
"The requested URL /~lucas/logs/2011-09-02/gnat-4.4_4.4.6-5_lsid64.buildlog was
not found on this server."
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc
Josh Triplett writes:
> When trying to use sparse on some low-level userspace code, I ran into
> the following error:
>
> /usr/include/bits/socket.h:381:11: error: unable to open 'asm/socket.h'
See http://bugs.debian.org/638418
Hope this helps
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To
tags 637418 upstream
forwarded 637418 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR50048
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87liuz6alw....@ludovic-brenta.org
i386 headers it is
so it looks like a bug in the kernel headers, but triggered
by eglibc
changes
I found that patching src/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in, in the
constant INCLUDES, to replace -I- (deprecated) with -iquote allowed
gnat-4.6 to build on i386.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To
6&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=4.6.1-3&stamp=1312911422
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87ty9q5srm@ludovic-brenta.org
you send the patch here for difference? It differs from
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg00139.html
I've already uploaded (yesterday evening) with my proposed patch but if
your patch is better, I'll be happy to upload with yours.
> Ludovic, I have copyright a
87r550ot4x....@ludovic-brenta.org
forwarded 636692 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR49444
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87sjpgot68....@ludovic-brenta.org
w)
This bug is about the second failure.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87wresp0tn@ludovic-brenta.org
Ludovic Brenta writes:
> The following commit broke kbsd-gnu.diff:
>
> r5442 | doko | 2011-07-23 08:20:31 +0200 (Sat, 23 Jul 2011) | 2 lines
>
> * Update to SVN 20110723 (r176672) from the gcc-4_6-branch.
>
> Specifically, it introduces a new hunk that patches gcc/config.gc
a hunk in
kbsd-gnu.diff.
Maybe it would be nice to apply kbsd-gnu.diff unconditionally, instead
of only on kfreebsd-*, so that such breakage becomes visible more
immediately?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubs
hich does not import the
function, but also uses s-taprop-linux.adb, which does use the function.
I am not sure what to do: either introduce a new file
s-taprop-kfreebsd-gnu.adb or provide the function __gnat_lwp_self also
on kfreebsd-* and import it in s-osinte-kfreebsd-gnu.ads.
--
Ludov
tags 634546 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
I have rebuilt gnat-4.6 successfully on amd64 on multiple occasions
since you filed this bug, including the upload of 4.6.1-2. Please close
the bug or provide more details.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ
roblem, which is in the upstream
sources. It is easy to correct; I'll upload a fix today or the day
after.
I've forwarded the bug as http://gcc.gnu.org/PR49819.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
#631627 (for gcc-4.6). And my earlier message on this list:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2011/06/msg00209.html
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb
tags 631926 wheezy pending
thanks
This bug affects testing/wheezy only (not sid) and can be closed when
libgcc1 (>= 1:4.6.0-12) migrates to testing. The current version in sid is
1:4.6.1-1.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
1-1.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/95ea965b416bea9d0602baa60c3fe60f@localhost
Thanks for submitting this bug for gcc-4.4; a similar one (#631627) exists
for gcc-4.6. My analysis of this bug (with workaround) is here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2011/06/msg00209.html
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
c1 has not migrated into testing yet?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/loom.20110627t173234-...@post.gmane.org
(=4.6.0-14)? (i.e. install it manually with dpkg, or update your system to
sid, or create a sid chroot)
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debi
l us what libgcc_s.so points to exactly.
I suspect that one of these paths are wrong, or the symlink is wrong, or
the compiler driver looks in the wrong place.
The same problem exists with gcc-4.4; cloning this bug accordingly.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
4.4+1.1_amd64.deb
> gcc_4%3a4.6.0-5_amd64.deb
>
> Any advice?
This looks like http://bugs.debian.org/631627 filed yesterday against
gcc, so it is probably common to all languages :(
I think instances of the bug are in both gcc-4.4 (affecting gnat) and
gcc-4.6 (affecting gcc). I'
Matthias Klose writes:
> On 04/22/2011 11:20 AM, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I see in aptitude:
>>
>>--\ Versions of gcc-4.6-source (2)
>> id 4.6.0-2 -60.1 MB
>> pi 4.6.0-4 +105 MB
>&
Hello,
I see in aptitude:
--\ Versions of gcc-4.6-source (2)
id 4.6.0-2 -60.1 MB
pi 4.6.0-4 +105 MB
Why the big difference? Is this intentional?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
and 4.6?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87zkopsbzz....@ludovic-brenta.org
1 - 100 of 339 matches
Mail list logo
