[Bug rtl-optimization/323] optimized code gives strange floating point results

2010-08-03 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #137 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-04 02:42 --- *** Bug 45175 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/45175] In gfortran, the calculation of small differences seems to depend on optimization flags

2010-08-03 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-04 02:42 --- This is a duplicate of PR 323 See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323 Just use -ffloat-store. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 323 *** -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org

[Bug fortran/42607] add information about how to compile a module

2010-04-04 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-04 15:02 --- That idea of a --clean is interesting. I can see where it would be useful to force a recompile of module files. I am not sure what the actual flag should be. Of course one could use make to do all of this

[Bug fortran/34616] CBLAS_ICAMAX test from cblas fails

2007-12-29 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-29 20:09 --- CBLAS actually has a few Fortran programs in it. The default build uses g77 on Linux. Regardless, I was able to build -m64 and -m32 without any failures using gfortran. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla