[Bug go/46963] SPARC64 Not Supported by Go

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46963 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug go/46961] PowerPC Not Supported By Go

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46961 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug go/46962] SPARC Not Supported By Go

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46962 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug go/46960] MIPS Not Supported by Go

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46960 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug go/46958] ARM Go Does Not Compile (__builtin_return_address)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46958 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug go/46965] SH Go Does not Compile (__builtin_return_address)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46965 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug go/46958] ARM Go Does Not Compile (__builtin_return_address)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46958 --- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-01-05 00:08:43 UTC --- Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- To

[Bug libgomp/42672] missing symbols in libgomp when linked with gold

--- Comment #1 from ian at airs dot com 2010-01-12 07:20 --- With the current development version of gold, I don't see any differences like this. I see symbols like omp_destroy_lock@@OMP_3.0, which is slightly different from the reported omp_destroy_l...@omp_3.0. I'm not

[Bug lto/42532] configuring with --enable-gold introduces many fails in the testsuite

--- Comment #3 from ian at airs dot com 2010-01-12 07:14 --- As far as I can tell, everything works fine with the current development version of gold. If you find more problems, please reopen with more details, such as the parts of the {gcc,g++}.log file for one of the failing lists

[Bug other/42670] demangler doesn't completely demangle a global constructors symbol

--- Comment #3 from ian at airs dot com 2010-01-09 18:16 --- c++filt is part of the binutils, but it just runs the demangler which is part of gcc. Any change here will be a change to the demangler. -- ian at airs dot com changed: What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/33029] [4.3 Regression] libgcc2.c:1890: internal compiler error: in local_cprop_pass, at gcse.c:3236

--- Comment #15 from ian at airs dot com 2007-09-05 05:34 --- Fixed. -- ian at airs dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug target/30255] register spills in x87 unit need to be 80-bit, not 64

--- Comment #8 from ian at airs dot com 2006-12-19 14:57 --- I think I agree that if we spill an 80387 register to the stack, and then load the value back into an 80387 register, that we should spill all 80 bits, rather than implicitly converting to DFmode or SFmode. This would

[Bug c++/24522] htonl in optimized template function generates compiler warning

--- Comment #3 from ian at airs dot com 2005-10-25 16:36 --- I believe this winds up being a duplicate of PR c++/8057, which is fixed on mainline. With the test case in the PR, I see the warning with 4.0, but I do not see the warning on mainline. Note that this slightly modified test

[Bug tree-optimization/13000] [3.4 Regression] [unit-at-a-time] Using -O2 cannot detect missing return statement in a function

--- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2005-04-12 18:49 --- The dependency on 17652 is there because of comment #17, q.v. We want to make sure that we back out the patch to c_finish_bc_stmt when it is no longer needed, which should happen after the tree-profiling branch is

[Bug tree-optimization/13000] [3.4 Regression] [unit-at-a-time] Using -O2 cannot detect missing return statement in a function

-- What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||17652 nThis|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13000 ---

[Bug tree-optimization/13000] [3.4 Regression] [unit-at-a-time] Using -O2 cannot detect missing return statement in a function

--- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2005-01-21 19:14 --- Note that if we do move to a better solution, i.e., building a CFG for inline functions, we should remove the patch to c_finish_bc_stmt in c-typeck.c. It prevents -Wunreachable from ever warning about an unreachable

[Bug tree-optimization/13000] [3.4 Regression] [unit-at-a-time] Using -O2 cannot detect missing return statement in a function

--- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2005-01-21 19:07 --- Fixed on mainline. -- What|Removed |Added Known to fail|4.0.0 3.4.0 |3.4.0

[Bug tree-optimization/13000] [3.4/4.0 Regression] [unit-at-a-time] Using -O2 cannot detect missing return statement in a function

--- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2005-01-21 02:52 --- Updated patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg01443.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13000 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug

[Bug tree-optimization/13000] [3.4/4.0 Regression] [unit-at-a-time] Using -O2 cannot detect missing return statement in a function

--- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2005-01-19 15:51 --- Proposed patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg01223.html -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/13000] [3.4/4.0 Regression] [unit-at-a-time] Using -O2 cannot detect missing return statement in a function

-- What|Removed |Added CC||ian at airs dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13000 --- You are receiving this mail

[Bug target/7618] [3.3/3.4 Regression] GCC 3.x vararg disallowed in virtual function

--- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2004-01-13 19:23 --- I posted a sample patch for the MIPS backend here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-01/msg01199.html This needs to be checked by someone with access to real hardware. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug target/7618] [3.3/3.4 Regression] GCC 3.x vararg disallowed in virtual function

-- What|Removed |Added CC||ian at wasabisystems dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7618 --- You are receiving this