--- Comment #16 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 18:52
---
Subject: Bug 16876
Author: amylaar
Date: Fri Aug 25 18:51:57 2006
New Revision: 116424
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116424
Log:
gcc:
PR tree-optimization/16876
--- Comment #15 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-24 19:13
---
Created an attachment (id=12130)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12130&action=view)
patch
I think this should do the trick.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?i
--- Comment #13 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-31 16:28
---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Subject: Bug 24912
>
> Author: hp
> Date: Sat Nov 19 21:56:17 2005
> New Revision: 107231
>
> URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=1072
--- Comment #36 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-19 12:01
---
While the patch will stop the bug from being triggered by the test case,
it does not fix th underlying combiner bug.
Any REG_NO_CONFLICT block could potentially be rendered invalid by an
inappropriate instruction
--- Comment #28 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-16 14:37
---
(In reply to comment #25)
> Smarter folks than me (iant ;-) suggest that "a multi-word rotate will
> normally
> need all the input bits when setting any of the output bits", so the entire
--- Comment #22 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 13:41
---
(In reply to comment #20)
> Created an attachment (id=10463)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10463&action=view) [edit]
> a full set of debugging dumps
>
> Re. comment #
--- Comment #21 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 13:16
---
(In reply to comment #17)
> Created an attachment (id=10461)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10461&action=view) [edit]
> Instruction stream (stripped) before scheduling
>
(
--- Comment #16 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 20:28
---
(In reply to comment #15)
> I can reproduce this on hppa2.0-suse-linux-gnu with the "4.2-20051210"
> snapshot.
Could you make a full set of debugging dumps (i.e. from compiling with -da)
ava
--- Additional Comments From amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-20
20:53 ---
Created an attachment (id=9783)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9783&action=view)
proposed patch
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23837
--- You are receivi
--- Additional Comments From amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-20
20:52 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> A regression hunt on i686-linux showed the failure starting with this patch
> from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-05/msg00640.html
--- Additional Comments From amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-20
19:06 ---
Confirmed with gcc version 4.1.0 20050919 (experimental) on i686-pc-linux-gnu.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-19
21:04 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> A regression hunt on i686-linux showed the failure starting with this patch
> from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-05/msg00640.html
If t
12 matches
Mail list logo
