Hi,
More strange: by adding an unused static method, the behavior
of the previous templates change.
$ cat toto6.cpp
#include
struct X {
template struct check_is_map {
static constexpr bool value = false;
};
template
struct check_is_map {
static constexpr bool value =
Package: g++-11
Version: 11.2.0-19
Severity: normal
Contrary to clang++, g++ does not honor "friend" statement when evaluating
template specialization
Here is a short example:
$ cat toto6.cpp
#include
struct X {
template struct check_is_map {
static constexpr bool value = false;
};
Package: gcc-multilib
Version: 4:11.2.0-2
Followup-For: Bug #872891
Hi,
I also have been hit by this bug.
I'm using several cross-tool chains (arm-linux-gnueabi, mipsel-linux-gnu,
i686-linux-gnu) and I was wondering why using plain gcc with -m32 does
not work.
Perhaps due to the fact that g
that an easy reproducible bug reported
against the current gcc package is closed because
- the gcc package change its name
- the old source package is removed
- whereas the bug is still present
So, doing the reopen and reassign.
Regards,
Vincent
--
Vincent Danjean GPG key ID 0xD17897FA
ng
^
titi.cpp:3:32: warning: unknown option after ‘#pragma GCC diagnostic’ kind
[-Wpragmas]
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wwrong-option"
^
vdanjean@eyak:/tmp$
--
Vincent Danjean GPG key ID 0xD17897FA vdanj...@debian.org
GPG key fingerpri
a warning [-Wcpp]
#warning this is a warning
^
titi.cpp:3:32: warning: unknown option after ‘#pragma GCC diagnostic’ kind
[-Wpragmas]
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wwrong-option"
^
vdanjean@eyak:/tmp$
--
Vincent Danjean GPG key ID 0xD17897FA vdanj.
Package: g++-4.7
Version: 4.7.1-7
Severity: normal
Hi,
Contrary to gcc, g++ ignore "#pragma GCC diagnostic ...".
Note that the GNU doc tell us that g++ support most of gcc pragma.
Moreover, g++ does not emit a warning about unknown pragma as it
does for typo.
Example:
vdanjean@eyak:/tmp$ cat
troduce some randomness) by default
in the compiler when the admin (or the user) wants it.
Regards,
Vincent
> -Kees
--
Vincent Danjean GPG key ID 0x9D025E87 vdanj...@debian.org
GPG key fingerprint: FC95 08A6 854D DB48 4B9A 8A94 0BF7 7867 9D02 5E87
Unofficial packages:
to the BTS.
Regards,
Vincent
--
Vincent Danjean Adresse: Laboratoire d'Informatique de Grenoble
Téléphone: +33 4 76 61 20 11ENSIMAG - antenne de Montbonnot
Fax:+33 4 76 61 20 99ZIRST 51, avenue Jean Kuntzmann
Email: vincent.danj...@imag.fr
On 27/04/2010 01:26, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 23.04.2010 10:22, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 08:41:53AM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
>>> Please, look at #577961. It seems to me that this is the same bug (and
>>> now, I think the bug belong t
-) )
>
> Actually that's wrong -- I did a full recompile, and now it fails even
> without -flto. Same error.
>
> /* Steinar */
Please, look at #577961. It seems to me that this is the same bug (and
now, I think the bug belong to gcc-4.5)
Regards,
Vincent
--
Vincent Danj
On 15/04/2010 17:04, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> The STL emits a weak pthread_cancel symbols into the object file of the main
> program.
>
> I'm not sure this is a bug because I understand what happens. But it seems
> strange to me
> that libraries required for an applicati
Package: libstdc++6-4.5-dev
Version: 4.5.0-1
Severity: normal
Tags: experimental
Hi,
I'm not sure if this bug behave to libstdc++6-4.5-dev or g++-4.5 or if this
is really a bug.
Here is what I observed: when
* a non-threaded application uses some part of the STL (such as )
and
* the appli
hat said, I have absolutely no idea if it is possible or not to allow
the user to choose its cross toolchain (but I'm sure that this would be
more difficult to implement than your proposition).
Regards,
Vincent
> Regards
--
Vincent Danjean GPG key ID 0x9D025E87 vdanj..
pdate-alternatives)
If this is right, I do not really see the advantage to divertion with
respect to conflicting packages.
Vincent
> Regards
--
Vincent Danjean GPG key ID 0x9D025E87 vdanj...@debian.org
GPG key fingerprint: FC95 08A6 854D DB48 4B9A 8A94 0BF7 7867 9D02 5E87
U
mit it) so dependencies can be correctly and
automatically managed.
Regards,
Vincent
PS: note that firefox is already packaged as iceweasel is Debian...
--
Vincent Danjean GPG key ID 0x9D025E87 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG key fingerprint: FC95 08A6 854D DB48 4B9A 8A94 0BF7 7867 9D02 5E8
atives.
Since, my selection is kept upon upgrade.
I do not investigate further but I think there is really a bug here
with the interaction of update-alternatives and update-java-alternatives.
Best regards,
Vincent
--
Vincent Danjean GPG key ID 0x9D025E87 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
G
Package: g++-4.3
Version: 4.3.0-3
Severity: normal
Here is a bug I discovered with g++-4.3. Other compilers (gcc-4.3,
g++-4.2) are perhaps also affected. It seems to me (but I do not check
as well as for g++-4.3).
Here is what can be done to reproduce the problem:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ mkdir
Package: g++-4.3
Version: 4.3.0-1
Severity: normal
The following code has three specializations of a template.
The third one compiles with g++-4.2 but gives an error with g++-4.3 :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/toto$ g++-4.3 -Wall -c test.cpp
test.cpp:30: error: template parameters not used in partia
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> I am able to reproduce this bug by adding a couple of options to g++.
> The instructions I used are
> yapp.cc:472: internal compiler error: in reference_to_unused, at
> dwarf2out.c:10010
Hi,
I think this is a duplicate of #445268 which is marked as fixed in
Package: g++-4.2
Version: 4.2.1-6
Followup-For: Bug #445268
Here is a minimal example to reproduce the bug.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/bug-g++$ cat bug.cpp
class Format {
public:
Format();
virtual ~Format();
};
class ThreadFormat : public Format {
public:
Th
21 matches
Mail list logo
