gcc-4.7 build failure on mipsel

2012-07-28 Thread Touko Korpela
gcc-4.7 version 4.7.1-5 failed to build on mipsel (earlier version built fine). Should it be tried again? After that freeze exception can be asked from release team. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists

Bug#680348: gcc-4.6: ICE on mips when compiling aiccu

2012-07-08 Thread Touko Korpela
Matthias Klose wrote: > On 05.07.2012 11:03, Axel Beckert wrote: > > Package: gcc-4.6 > > Severity: normal > > Affects: aiccu > > > > Dear Maintainer, > > > > gcc-4.6 failed to compile aiccu on mips (but not mipsel) with the > > following error message: > > > > ../common/tun.c:69:1: internal com

Bug#676729: feel++: FTBFS: operators.hpp:722:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

2012-06-10 Thread Touko Korpela
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 10:41:41PM +0200, Christophe Prud'homme wrote: > reassign 676729 gcc-4.7 4.7.0-12 > thanks > > On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Christophe Prud'homme > wrote: > > Hello > > > > I get an ice with gcc47 (see email below) > > > > I am trying to reproduce it. > > Shouldn't it

Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)

2012-05-31 Thread Touko Korpela
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 09:40:36PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 07:42:28PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > > On 31/05/12 07:59, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > FWIW, it has been confirmed to be gcc 4.7 miscompiling. It is supposed > > > to be fixed in upcoming 4.7.1. > > > > The

Bug#432861: Compiles arch/x86_64/kernel/signal.c from Linux 2.6.22 incorrectly

2007-07-12 Thread Touko Korpela
Martin Orr wrote: > binutils (>= 2.17cvs20070426) | 2.17.20070406cvs-2 I don't know if it makes difference but you should try to upgrade binutils away from that version from experimental. Apt and other utils think that experimental has bigger version number than more recent in unstable.

Bug#428509: gcc-4.1 post 4.1.2-8 breaks glibc compilation

2007-07-10 Thread Touko Korpela
Was this bug in gcc or glibc (or both)? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]