Is there a workaround for this bug, while waiting for gcc <4.8 to get
fixed? Holding libstdc++6 back tends to break stuff.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.o
Hi Matthias,
> Please could you name the software where you did see this failure?
I only spotted this regression in my own development code, so it seems
that the impact is limited after all.
Thanks,
Tim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscr
This also seems to apply to already-compiled binaries, e.g. if I compile the
aforementioned testcase with libstdc++6 version 4.8.0-7, which results in
correct output, and then upgrade libstdc++6 to version 4.8.0-8, re-running the
testcase without recompilation results in faulty output.
So since th
Package: libstdc++6
Version: 4.8.0-8
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Attached test case gets the current system time using std::chrono and using
gettimeofday, both with millisecond precision. Using libstdc++6 version 4.8.0-7,
this code works properly, both timestamps being identical. However
4 matches
Mail list logo