Arm ports build machines (was Re: Arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concerns)

2018-06-29 Thread Steve McIntyre
the moment*, particularly when considering A32 support. In suitable rack cases with PDU and serial console, would those work for DSA's needs? [1] http://macchiatobin.net/ [2] https://www.cnx-software.com/2017/09/24/gigabyte-synquacer-96boards-enterprise-platform-is-powered-by-socionext-sc2a11-2

Bug#783876: Seriously, these binaries should be stripped by default

2016-04-21 Thread Steve McIntyre
ust) squeeze into 1 CD again. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "This dress doesn't reverse." -- Alden Spiess

Bug#783876: Seriously, these binaries should be stripped by default

2016-04-21 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:31:46PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:40:34PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: >> >>The unstripped binaries should be installed by default on porter boxes and >>buildds. Yes, this is a trade-off between (largely my) develope

Bug#783876: Seriously, these binaries should be stripped by default

2016-04-21 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:40:34PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: >Control: severity -1 important > >On 21.04.2016 19:28, Steve McIntyre wrote: >>Control: severity -1 serious >>Justification: wasting many megabytes of space and download > >sorry, I don't see th

Bug#783876: Seriously, these binaries should be stripped by default

2016-04-21 Thread Steve McIntyre
. > >so how do the unstripped ones get installed by default on porter boxes? How >are the unstripped ones installed on the buildds by default? By talking to the admins of those boxes, maybe? The setup on those is already heavily scripted, so hopefully shouldn't be too difficult to ada

Bug#783876: Seriously, these binaries should be stripped by default

2016-04-21 Thread Steve McIntyre
rate debug symbols, maybe ship separate alternative unstripped toolchain packages and point to those if people want them? -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "When C++ is your hammer, everything looks like a thumb." -- Steven M. Haflich

Bug#758964: closed by Matthias Klose (Bug#758964: fixed in gcc-4.9 4.9.1-13)

2014-09-13 Thread Steve McIntyre
nd look for "error: insn does not satisfy its constraints". The ARM gcc guys are working on extending the fix to cover this new case too. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "C++ ate my sanity" -- Jon Rabone -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, em

Bug#758964: gcc-4.9 assembler errors when building md5 code from fbb on arm64

2014-09-05 Thread Steve McIntyre
20.html So I'm tagging this appropriately. Other packages affected are (at least): alpine einspline fbb jigit uw-imap vdmfec vxl yasm and yasm is quite critical as a build-dep. Matthias: would you like me to do some testing with that patch as well, or are you already on top

Bug#657157: Produces NEON code on armhf even when explicitly asked not to

2012-01-24 Thread Steve McIntyre
Package: gcc-4.6 Version: 4:4.6.2-12 Severity: important Hi, Looking at a FTBFS bug on armhf in the pytables package. gcc-4.6 seems to be emitting NEON code even when explicitly told not to: (sid)93sam@harris:~$ gcc -c typeconv.c -march=armv7-a -mfloat-abi=hard -mfpu=vfpv3-d16 -mthumb -o typeco

Bug#625357: jigit: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror

2011-06-03 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 01:16:59PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >severity 625357 normal >retitle 625357 gcc -Wunused-but-set-variable should not be implied by -Wall (?) >tags 625357 = upstream moreinfo >quit > >Hi again, > >Steve McIntyre wrote: > >> I'll r

Bug#625357: jigit: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror

2011-06-03 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 05:05:27PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >Hi Steve, > >Steve McIntyre wrote: > >> I'll remove the -Werror to stop gcc breaking the build here, but I >> definitely believe that gcc is doing the wrong thing here. >> Technically, yes - the va

Bug#233393: acknowledged by developer (Re: Inefficient packaging of arch independent data in package libgcj4)

2004-04-26 Thread Steve McIntyre
xplicitly for arch/OS independent files, surely? -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED] Is there anybody out there? pgpJeMz0qag9g.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#233393: Inefficient packaging of arch independent data in package libgcj4

2004-02-17 Thread Steve McIntyre
there's a problem here but need help to fix it: again, feel free to ask... Thanks, -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED]