).
| Hunk #2 succeeded at 209 (offset -5 lines).
| patching file src/gcc/unwind-generic.h
| Hunk #1 succeeded at 211 (offset -3 lines).
| Hunk #2 succeeded at 230 (offset -3 lines).
| Patch cross-fixes.diff does not apply (enforce with -f)
| make: *** [stamps/02-patch-stamp] Error 1
--
Stephen R. Marenka
Package: java-gcj-compat
Version: 1.0.77-2
Severity: important
Please switch the m68k build-dep from gcj-4.1 to gcj-4.2 (like most
everybody else).
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Desc
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 02:20:20AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka writes:
> > Package: gcc-defaults
> > Version: 1.61
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Please change the defaults to use gcc-4.2 like the other archs. A number
> > of pack
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 02:20:20AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka writes:
> > Package: gcc-defaults
> > Version: 1.61
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Please change the defaults to use gcc-4.2 like the other archs. A number
> > of pack
Package: gcc-defaults
Version: 1.61
Severity: important
Please change the defaults to use gcc-4.2 like the other archs. A number
of package, notably perl and gnustep-base, now require gcc-4.2. We now
have about 400 packages blocked on this.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life&#
f necessary.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ction on output
| collect2: ld returned 1 exit statue
hello.c:
void main(void)
{
printf("Hello world\n");
}
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Using built-in specs.
Target: m68k-linux-gnu
Configured with: ..
x27; isn't defined
| /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output
| collect2: ld returned 1 exit statue
hello.c:
void main(void)
{
printf("Hello world\n");
}
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL
build the package with itself (although this will
> be done with the next uploads anyway).
I see the listmasters have straightened this message out. I'm building
gcj-4.1 on vivaldi.
Peace,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.html
|
| bye, Roman
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ttp://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=gnat-4.1&ver=4.1.1-19&arch=m68k>
Other buildd logs may be available at
<http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=gnat-4.1>
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
the failed builds of yacas and vtk.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
aybe it's best to disable java for m68k.
Sorry about the dup.
Disabling java takes out a fair amount of packages that we could no
longer build. Can you point me to the patch?
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
libgcj.so.7)
|at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(libgcj.so.7)
|at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(libgcj.so.7)
|at java.lang.Class.forName(libgcj.so.7)
|at gnu.java.lang.MainThread.run(libgcj.so.7)
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doi
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:56:54PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 09:08:42PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> >> Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > So you&#x
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:56:54PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 09:08:42PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> >> Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > So you&#x
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 09:08:42PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > We now have about sixteen packages that end up with a segfault or an
> > illegal instruction. I haven't tried recompiling all these to verify that
direct or we can get you access to m68k
hardware if necessary.
In the meantime maybe it would be good to have gcc build itself or at
least the bootstrap compiler -O0?
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 05:47:06PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-27 10:35]:
> > torcs, grace, and rscheme all fail with variations on the theme of
> > track.s: Assembler messages:
> > track.s:10716: Error: value ou
e happier I'll be. :)
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
nd RMs.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
d fine.
> I also have some evidence that -fomit-frame-pointer produce
> broken code on m68k, but this bug make them hard to debug.
Maybe you can make some progress for us on this now. :)
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it ri
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 08:31:07AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 03:22:50PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > qt4-x11 needs to be rebuilt on m68k, anything using it currently will
> > give errors that libXcursor.la can't be found.
> > Anyon
1. I'm really not sure if they would
apply to us (or if they've already been fixed).
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
The ruby1.9 bug only happens at -O2, so might be considered a separate
bug. Shall I close this one and open a new one or continue the report
here?
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Desc
ver=4.0.3-1&arch=m68k&stamp=1143526132&file=log&as=raw>.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
). Patch by
Roman Zippel" applied in 4.0.1-9.
However, ruby1.9 failed with something that looks the same to me, so I
don't know what to think.
<http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=ruby1.9&ver=1.9.0%2B20050921-1&arch=m68k&stamp=1138785971&file=log&as=ra
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 03:59:46PM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> in #344046, you mention upstream is working on this. Can you give more
> details? Is there a PR? A fix?
pr 25514
So far it's only been noted that it fails with gcc-4.1 and a reduced
testcase has been added.
--
Stephen
In function
| `_start':../sysdeps/m68k/elf/start.S:86: undefined reference to `main'
| collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
set (reg:SI 8 %a0 [611])
| (plus:SI (subreg:SI (reg:QI 133 [ temp.1409 ]) 0)
| (const_int 32 [0x20]))) 95 {*addsi3_internal} (nil)
| (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:QI 133 [ temp.1409 ])
| (nil)))
| pack.c:1974: confused by earlier errors, bailing out
Fortunately, it seems fixed in 4
nd: change -O2 to -O1.
Hopefully, I've reduced this enough.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
/* based on variable.c from make_3.80+3.81.b4-1 */
#define NULL 0
#include
struct variable_set
{
Filed upstream as gnu pr 25043. Confirmed, fixed in 4.1.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ks. Dropping -O2 to
-O1 also works.
I wasn't able to find a simpler file that illustrated the problem, but
the attached are pretty short.
This code works fine on the other ports.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 08:05:19PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> with the current state of java on m68k, it seems to be better to
> disable it. Any opinions?
Are you of the opinion that java will take a great deal of work to fix?
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you&#
);
} }
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
{*68k_extendhisi2} (nil)
| (nil))
| gengtype-yacc.c:1738: internal compiler error: in
reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:393
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 08:34:34AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> yes, please try to build the gcj database:
>
> gcj-dbtool-4.0 -n /tmp/foo.db
I misunderstood the bug. It still aborts.
Sorry,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doin
n fixed along the way.
Would you prefer for me to do something else? I could just update the
bug reports instead of closing them, for instance.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
piler error: in
| instantiate_virtual_regs_lossage, at function.c:1442
| Please submit a full bug report,
| with preprocessed source if appropriate.
| See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
| For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions,
| see .
--
Stephen R. Marenka
ad model: posix
gcc version 3.3.4 (Debian)
Please let me know if there anything else I can do.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
hen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpvVapFjqcad.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I can confirm this bug is fixed as of gcc-3.2_1:3.2.3ds6-0pre7.
However, I cannot help but note the similarity to 175478. I'll comment
further there.
Thanks!
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpIoWvl
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 08:02:28PM +, James Troup wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Package: gcc-3.2
> > Version: 1:3.2.2-0pre3
> > Severity: important
> > Tags: sid
> >
> >
> > ltp fails to build from source du
tp&ver=20030206-1&arch=m68k>
Other buildd logs may be available at
<http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=ltp>
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
s to have "fixed"
the problem.
> Btw. I was going to take a quick look at this, but I can't seem to get
> into the unstable chroot on crest. I thought those were supposed to be
> public? Or maybe I just haven't found the right command...
dchroot?
--
Stephen R. Mar
45 matches
Mail list logo
