the package (and then making the upload include changes
> from both releases). Is that suitable from your POV?
Yes, that would be fine.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
> >
> > > On Mon, 16 Sept 2024 at 22:27, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> > > > Dmitry,
> > > >
> > > > debian/source/format lists this package as 3.0 (native). Is Debian
the
> > > > upstream for this package?
> > >
> > >
?
On Monday, September 16, 2024 1:31:16 PM MST Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Soren,
>
> On Mon, 16 Sept 2024 at 22:27, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> > Dmitry,
> >
> > debian/source/format lists this package as 3.0 (native). Is Debian the
> > upstream for this package?
&
of background on why parts of this package are
non-free? I am having a hard time imagining that the Free Software Foundation
released a bunch of documentation that isn’t DFSG-free.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Dmitry,
It looks like the Salsa repository does not contain your most recent changes.
When sponsoring packages I like to build from Git. Can you please push them
there?
On Monday, September 16, 2024 12:44:51 PM MST Soren Stoutner wrote:
> Control: owner -1 !
>
> Dmitry,
>
>
gcc-docs removed from testing (scheduled for September 20th).
>
> [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2024/09/msg00059.html
> [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2024/09/msg00058.html
> [3] https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2024/09/msg00060.html
--
Soren Stoutn
6 matches
Mail list logo
