On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 13:36:57 +0100 Niels Thykier wrote:
Package: gcc-14-cross-mipsen
Version: 3+c1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net
User: ni...@thykier.net
Usertags: rrr-no-as-default-issue
Dear maintainer,
While reviewing packages for potential issues with `Rules-Requires
Matthias Klose:
On 14.12.24 13:33, Niels Thykier wrote:
Package: gcc-14-cross
Version: 7
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net
User: ni...@thykier.net
Usertags: rrr-no-as-default-issue
Dear maintainer,
While reviewing packages for potential issues with `Rules-Requires-
Root: no
Package: gcc-11-cross-ports
Version: 18
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net
User: ni...@thykier.net
Usertags: rrr-no-as-default-issue
Dear maintainer,
While reviewing packages for potential issues with `Rules-Requires-Root:
no` as default, this package was deemed at risk of havi
Package: gcc-14-cross-mipsen
Version: 3+c1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net
User: ni...@thykier.net
Usertags: rrr-no-as-default-issue
Dear maintainer,
While reviewing packages for potential issues with `Rules-Requires-Root:
no` as default, this package was deemed at risk of h
Package: gcc-12-cross-mipsen
Version: 5+c1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net
User: ni...@thykier.net
Usertags: rrr-no-as-default-issue
Dear maintainer,
While reviewing packages for potential issues with `Rules-Requires-Root:
no` as default, this package was deemed at risk of h
Package: gcc-13-cross-mipsen
Version: 4+c1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net
User: ni...@thykier.net
Usertags: rrr-no-as-default-issue
Dear maintainer,
While reviewing packages for potential issues with `Rules-Requires-Root:
no` as default, this package was deemed at risk of h
Package: gcc-14-cross-ports
Version: 8
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net
User: ni...@thykier.net
Usertags: rrr-no-as-default-issue
Dear maintainer,
While reviewing packages for potential issues with `Rules-Requires-Root:
no` as default, this package was deemed at risk of havin
Package: gcc-12-cross-ports
Version: 17
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net
User: ni...@thykier.net
Usertags: rrr-no-as-default-issue
Dear maintainer,
While reviewing packages for potential issues with `Rules-Requires-Root:
no` as default, this package was deemed at risk of havi
Package: gcc-13-cross-ports
Version: 19
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net
User: ni...@thykier.net
Usertags: rrr-no-as-default-issue
Dear maintainer,
While reviewing packages for potential issues with `Rules-Requires-Root:
no` as default, this package was deemed at risk of havi
Package: gcc-14-cross
Version: 7
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net
User: ni...@thykier.net
Usertags: rrr-no-as-default-issue
Dear maintainer,
While reviewing packages for potential issues with `Rules-Requires-Root:
no` as default, this package was deemed at risk of having an i
Package: gcc-13-cross
Version: 15
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net
User: ni...@thykier.net
Usertags: rrr-no-as-default-issue
Dear maintainer,
While reviewing packages for potential issues with `Rules-Requires-Root:
no` as default, this package was deemed at risk of having an
Package: gcc-12-cross
Version: 19
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net
User: ni...@thykier.net
Usertags: rrr-no-as-default-issue
Dear maintainer,
While reviewing packages for potential issues with `Rules-Requires-Root:
no` as default, this package was deemed at risk of having an
Package: gcc-11-cross-mipsen
Version: 6+c1+nmu1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net
User: ni...@thykier.net
Usertags: rrr-no-as-default-issue
Dear maintainer,
While reviewing packages for potential issues with `Rules-Requires-Root:
no` as default, this package was deemed at risk
Package: gcc-11-cross
Version: 21
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net
User: ni...@thykier.net
Usertags: rrr-no-as-default-issue
Dear maintainer,
While reviewing packages for potential issues with `Rules-Requires-Root:
no` as default, this package was deemed at risk of having an
Breno Leitao:
> Hi Niels,
>
> On 06/27/2018 05:03 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
>> List of concerns for architectures
>> ==
>>
>> The following is a summary from the current architecture qualification
>> table.
>>
>&
in
time for inclusion in buster.
On behalf of the release team,
Niels Thykier
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Source: debhelper
Source-Version: 10.10.6
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 08:15:38 +0200 Matthias Klose wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 debhelper
> Control: tags -1 -patch
>
> > dh_strip can do it now with setting DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE
> > The attached patch can fix this bug.
>
> No, it can't handle cases with H
Control: forcemerge 841438 841500
Hi Eric,
Sorry to hear you ran into issues with gcc-6.
On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 10:40:47 +0200 Eric Valette
wrote:
> [...]
>
> Entering directory '/usr/src/linux-dell'
> GEN ./Makefile
> scripts/kconfig/conf --oldconfig Kconfig
> #
> # configuration written
Control: severity -1 normal
On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:48:52 +0100 Klaus Ethgen wrote:
>
> Package: gcc-6
> Version: 6.2.0-7
> Severity: critical
>
> The --enable-default-pie option breaks make-kpkg and normal kernel
> builds as the kernel cannot be compiled with pie option.
>
> [...]
>
> - --
>
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:25:30 +0200 Balint Reczey
wrote:
> Package: gcc-6
> Version: 6.1.1-12
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> Dear Matthias,
>
> As a continuation of the discussions [1][2] on debian-devel I'm
> attaching the simple patch that implements enabling the PIE
> hardening flags f
On 2014-02-01 02:36, Daigo Moriwaki wrote:
> Hi team,
>
Hi,
> Looking at buildd status, my 'libunwind' package has been "Installed"
> successfully on all the architecture that the package is expected to be
> built on. However, it has never entered testing. "Check why" [1] says that
> libunwind7
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
Please remove gdc-4.4 from unstable; it no longer has any reverse
(build-)dependencies[1] and it is one of the blockers for removing
gcc-4.4.
~Niels
[1] dak here lists a number of build-depends for the virtual package
libphobos-dev; but AFAICT this v
On 2013-10-25 13:13, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It is my understanding that the GCC maintainers had a number of concerns
> with various ports (or architecture specific issues related to gcc).
> Please forward a list of the issues/bugs (be it Debian or upstream ones)
> that
Hi,
It is my understanding that the GCC maintainers had a number of concerns
with various ports (or architecture specific issues related to gcc).
Please forward a list of the issues/bugs (be it Debian or upstream ones)
that requires help from porters to solve to debian-rele...@lists.debian.org.
~
Package: gcc-defaults,newlib
Severity: important
Dear maintainers of gcc-defaults and newlib,
I noticed that gcc-defaults have removed the "gnu-spu" package in sid,
but newlib still build-depends on it. Since there was no bug against
either package, I am assuming no one has noticed this so far.
Package: gcj-jdk
Severity: normal
Hi,
Passing -source 1.5 to GCJ's javadoc implementation with an error saying
only 1.2, 1.3 and 1.4 is supported. However, it does seem to have support
for it[1].
It is possible that the file
libjava/classpath/tools/gnu/classpath/tools/gjdoc/Main.java
just need
Package: gcc-defaults
Severity: wishlist
Please provide a meta-package for the gcj-jdk-source. This will
allow java-common to provide a default-jdk-source package that
is not out of sync with gcc-defaults.
See #641880 for more information.
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ.
Package: gcj-jdk
Version: 4:4.4.5-2
Severity: minor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hey
I noticed that dh_nativejava/aotcompile does not cope very well if
the jar file contains a : (e.g. from a version number). It seems
that it uses make at some point with a pattern that cannot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
reassign 354601 gcj-4.4-jdk
found 354601 4.4.3-1
retitle 354601 gcj: eclipse cannot handle projects/Class files with umlaut
using gcj.
thanks
Hi
Using openjdk-6 and eclipse 3.5.2 I cannot reproduce this issue. We also
received a report from 2008
Package: java-gcj-compat-dev
Severity: serious
Hi
java-gcj-compat-dev cannot be installed in unstable due to conflicts between
gjdoc and gcj-jdk.
java-gcj-compat-dev (1.0.80-5.1) Depends on ..., gcj, ..., gjdoc (>= 0.7.8), ...
gcj (4:4.4.2-1) Depends on ..., gcj-jdk (>= 4:4.4.2-1)
gcj-jdk (4:4.4
30 matches
Mail list logo
