Hi Helmut,
On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 07:57:00PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> I don't think that anything (in Debian) links
> libdebuginfod at present.
There is a list of programs here:
https://sourceware.org/elfutils/Debuginfod.html We hope it will be
used by any program that uses debuginfo. Ask
server or just
the client would be build:
commit f7f0cdc59a13780938ae3f578955737a75e60ea9
Author: Mark Wielaard
Date: Fri Jun 19 19:41:08 2020 +0200
debuginfod: Add --disable-libdebuginfod and --enable-libdebuginfod=dummy.
Make it possible to build just the debuginfod clien
On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 00:03 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Am 30.04.2014 00:04, schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
> > > So reading about this, this might break glibc when you enable it
> > > and they might need to build some files without it.
> >
> > Is this enabled by any other distributions?
>
> I assume thi
On Sun, 2014-05-18 at 16:37 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Is this enabled by any other distributions?
On fedora and RHEL -fasynchronous-unwind-tables is enabled on all
architectures for gcc (otherwise rpmbuild will add it as standard flag).
So all packages are always build with it so you will alw
Hi Matthias,
On Sat, 2006-08-05 at 23:15 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Using the gcj/jc1 from the gcc-4_1-rh-branch to build the merged
> sources shows the same behaviour, so I assume that the problem is in
> the libjava/classpath merge, not in the gcc/java merge. Any help or
> suggestions are we
5 matches
Mail list logo
