On 10/11/2010 02:26 PM, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
>
> Dear release managers,
>
> Because gcc-4.4 (>=4.4.5) is now in Squeeze, gnat-4.4 (=4.4.4-5) no longer
> builds from source. An updated gnat-4.4 package (merging all the packaging
> changes from gcc-4.4) is available in unstable. Please unblock i
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:20:38AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Dienstag, 12. Januar 2010, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>>> Please don't forget to usertag the reports. Using the "ftbfs-gcc-4.5"
>>> usertag should make it easier to track them (which would later make th
Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> gnat-4.4 (4.4.2-4) which fixes this bug has now reached testing.
> Could someone please rebuild the following packages and upload?
> This would allow them to also reach testing.
>
> adacontrol
> libtemplates-parser
> adabrowse
given back
> libaws (build-depends on libtemp
Package: gnat-4.4
Version: 4.4.2-3
Severity: serious
Hi
gnat-4.4 FTBFS on mipsel with the following error:
make[6]: Entering directory
`/build/buildd-gnat-4.4_4.4.2-3-mipsel-nr7DIl/gnat-4.4-4.4.2/build/prev-gcc'
(cd `${PWDCMD-pwd}`/include-fixed ; \
tar -cf - .; exit 0) | (cd
/build/b
Package: gnat-4.4
Version: 4.4.2-3
Severity: serious
Hi
gnat-4.4 needs gnat-4.4 (>= 4.4.2-1) for building which is not availalble on
mips. This blocks the testing migration of gcc-defaults and as such many other
packages.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.deb
notfixed 541258 4.3.4-3
thanks
Hi
The testsuite is still run on sparc and still times out, so reopening
this bug.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
's no feedback yet from the FSF. This issue should not
> prevent upgrading GCC to 4.4 for squeeze. I talked with Luk Claes, and
> we came to the conclusion that raising awareness for this potential
> issue with compilers distributed with Debian and filing a bug report to
> track pr
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 23:22:36 +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
>
>> We only build the user-docs nowadays, and that actually wouldn't be
>> necessary if
>> Debian's build system did what the policy says: There is no need to re-build
>> the
>> architecture independent st
Arthur Loiret wrote:
> Hi!
Hi Arthur
> Since Debian version 4.3.3-2, gcc-4.3 has a fix for PR
> middle-end/38969 [0], which, added to some more fixes committed to the
> gcc-4_3-branch or backported from trunk, made it suitable enough to
> build glibc on alpha. We are now planning to make it the d
Matthias Klose wrote:
> Please consider for testing:
>
> gcc-4.1 (4.1.2-25) sid; urgency=low
>
>* Update backport for PR28322 (Gunther Nikl).
>
> gcc-4.2 (4.2.4-6) unstable; urgency=low
>
>* Update to SVN 20090117 from the ubuntu/gcc-4_2-branch.
> - Fix PR c++/38850, PR c++/360
Matthias Klose wrote:
> please consider gcc-4.1 (4.1.2-24) for testing. all changes except the update
> on
> the gcc-4_1-branch do not affect Debian unstable. the --with-tune=generic
> change
> wasn't really necessary, it was already the default. no regressions seen in
> the
> gcc testsuite.
un
Matthias Klose wrote:
> Luk Claes schrieb:
>> Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> Matthias Klose schrieb:
>>>> There are some more regressions fixed on the gcc-4_3-branch. At least
>>>> for some of those we should consider an update. I scanned the branch
>&g
Matthias Klose wrote:
> Matthias Klose schrieb:
>> There are some more regressions fixed on the gcc-4_3-branch. At least
>> for some of those we should consider an update. I scanned the branch
>> for wrong-code regressions with -O2/-O3 and prepared an update at [1].
>> No regressions found in the
Matthias Klose wrote:
> The recent gcc-4.3_4.3.1-9 uploaded to testing should be a candidate
> for testing (together with gcj-4.3_4.3.1-9). The testsuite doesn't
> show regressions on the architectures where it is already built
> (compared to the gcc-4.3_4.3.1-2 as found in testing). Lucas Nussba
Ludovic Brenta wrote:
Hi
Hi
The version of gcc-4.3 currently in testing is 4.3.1-2 but 4.3.1-8 is in
unstable. Is there a plan to allow 4.3.0-8 into testing? The reason I'm asking
is because I'm about to upload gnat-4.3 4.3.1-2 with the changelog below, and I
would like this version to migrat
Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> Luk Claes writes:
>> You do realise that gnat-4.2 is needed for gcc-defaults to be able
>> to migrate to testing? gnat-4.2 FTBFS on s390... So the build
>> failure either needs to be fixed or gnat-4.2 needs to be restricted
>> to the architectur
You do realise that gnat-4.2 is needed for gcc-defaults to be able to
migrate to testing? gnat-4.2 FTBFS on s390... So the build failure
either needs to be fixed or gnat-4.2 needs to be restricted to the
architectures where it is still needed and the obsolete binaries should
be removed...
Cheers
Package: libstdc++6-4.3-dev
Severity: important
Version: 4.3.0-1
g++ -O2 -g -Wall -W -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align
-Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic -ffor-scope
-c tcp.cpp
In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.3/vector:71,
from userlist.h:9,
Package: libstdc++2.10-dev
Severity: serious
Version: 2.95.4.ds15-26
Hi
Your package is not installable on alpha or ia64 as it depends on
libc6-dev which is not available on these architectures. You might want
to depend on libc6.1-dev on these architectures...
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http
19 matches
Mail list logo
