Bug#1091308: debugedit: FTBFS on armhf: tests fail

Source: debugedit Version: 1:5.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build on armhf. This package currently has binary packages on armhf, s

Bug#1067291: gcc-14-cross-ports: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:378: stamp-dir/init-gcc] Error 1

Source: gcc-14-cross-ports Version: 4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/rules build >

Bug#1048610: nvptx-tools: Fails to build source after successful build

Source: nvptx-tools Version: 0.20230721-1 Severity: minor Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-sab-20230813 ftbfs-source-after-build User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-doublebuild Hi, This package fails to build a source package after a successful build (dpkg-b

Bug#1046055: mpfr4: Fails to build source after successful build

Source: mpfr4 Version: 4.2.0-1 Severity: minor Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-sab-20230813 ftbfs-source-after-build User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-doublebuild Hi, This package fails to build a source package after a successful build (dpkg-buildpackage

Bug#1045055: creduce: Fails to build source after successful build

Source: creduce Version: 2.10.0+20220116-1 Severity: minor Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-sab-20230813 ftbfs-source-after-build User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-doublebuild Hi, This package fails to build a source package after a successful build (dpkg-

Bug#1044955: debugedit: Fails to build source after successful build

Source: debugedit Version: 1:5.0-5 Severity: minor Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-sab-20230813 ftbfs-source-after-build User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-doublebuild Hi, This package fails to build a source package after a successful build (dpkg-buildpac

Bug#1044771: elfutils: Fails to build source after successful build

Source: elfutils Version: 0.189-4 Severity: minor Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-sab-20230813 ftbfs-source-after-build User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-doublebuild Hi, This package fails to build a source package after a successful build (dpkg-buildpack

Bug#1044154: gcc-12: Fails to build source after successful build

Source: gcc-12 Version: 12.3.0-7 Severity: minor Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-sab-20230813 ftbfs-source-after-build User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-doublebuild Hi, This package fails to build a source package after a successful build (dpkg-buildpacka

Bug#1044038: autofdo: Fails to build source after successful build

Source: autofdo Version: 0.19-2.3 Severity: minor Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-sab-20230813 ftbfs-source-after-build User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-doublebuild Hi, This package fails to build a source package after a successful build (dpkg-buildpack

Bug#1044029: autoconf2.69: Fails to build source after successful build

Source: autoconf2.69 Version: 2.69-3.1 Severity: minor Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-sab-20230813 ftbfs-source-after-build User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-doublebuild Hi, This package fails to build a source package after a successful build (dpkg-buil

Bug#1026597: gcc-10-cross-ports: FTBFS: collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

Source: gcc-10-cross-ports Version: 20 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > /<>/gcc/build/./

Bug#1026530: gcc-10: FTBFS: mount.h:95:6: error: multiple definition of 'enum fsconfig_command'

Source: gcc-10 Version: 10.4.0-5 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > /bin/bash ./libtool -

Bug#1022381: cvise: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:13: override_dh_auto_configure] Error 2

Source: cvise Version: 2.5.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Entering direct

Bug#1022357: gcc-12-cross-ports: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat 'html/gm2.html': No such file or directory

Source: gcc-12-cross-ports Version: 10 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > mv stamps/07-ins

Bug#1022350: gcc-12-cross: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat 'html/gm2.html': No such file or directory

Source: gcc-12-cross Version: 12 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20221023 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > mv stamps/07-install-s

Bug#1020001: gdb-bpf: FTBFS: completer.c:2014:10: error: invalid conversion from ‘const char*’ to ‘char*’ [-fpermissive]

Source: gdb-bpf Version: 4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > g++ -x c++-I. -I/<>/upst

Bug#1017232: gcc-11-cross: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: libc6-dev-amd64-cross (= 2.33-1cross1), libc6-dev-amd64-cross (= 2.33-1cross1), libc6-dev-amd64-cross (>= 2.32)

Source: gcc-11-cross Version: 14 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220813 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > +-

Bug#1017216: gcc-12-cross: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: libc6-dev-amd64-cross (= 2.33-1cross1), libc6-dev-amd64-cross (= 2.33-1cross1), libc6-dev-amd64-cross (>= 2.32)

Source: gcc-12-cross Version: 7 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220813 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > +--

Bug#1017192: gcc-10-cross: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: libc6-dev-amd64-cross (= 2.33-1cross1), libc6-dev-amd64-cross (= 2.33-1cross1), libc6-dev-amd64-cross (>= 2.31)

Source: gcc-10-cross Version: 18 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220813 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > +-

Bug#1017141: gcc-10-cross-mipsen: FTBFS: conftest.c:80: undefined reference to `fprintf_unlocked'

Source: gcc-10-cross-mipsen Version: 3+c5 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220813 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > /usr/bin/ld:

Bug#1017129: gcc-11-cross-mipsen: FTBFS: conftest.c:80: undefined reference to `fprintf_unlocked'

Source: gcc-11-cross-mipsen Version: 5+c1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220813 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > /usr/bin/ld:

Bug#1016238: autofdo: FTBFS: llvm_profile_writer.cc:54:42: error: cannot convert ‘const llvm::StringMap’ to ‘const llvm::sampleprof::SampleProfileMap&’ {aka ‘const s

Source: autofdo Version: 0.19-2.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -

Bug#1015053: gcc-12-cross-ports: FTBFS: collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

Source: gcc-12-cross-ports Version: 2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > /bin/bash ../libt

Bug#1008326: gcc-10-cross-ports: FTBFS: checking for suffix of executables... collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

Source: gcc-10-cross-ports Version: 19 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220326 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > /<>/gcc/build/./

Bug#1007082: "patch" available

Hi, Please also see https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/03/msg00096.html , where it was noticed that the conversion for this package is trivial, and builds bit-by-bit identical binary packages. Lucas

Bug#1007082: mpclib3: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format

Source: mpclib3 Version: 1.2.1-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: bookworm sid Usertags: format1.0 format1.0-kp-nv Dear maintainer, This package is among the few (1.9%) that still use source format 1.0 in bookworm. Please upgrade it to source format 3.0, as (1) this format has many advantages, as docume

Bug#1005685: cvise: FTBFS: The imported target "RemoteIndexProto" references the file "/usr/lib/llvm-13/lib/libRemoteIndexProto.a" but this file does not exist.

Source: cvise Version: 2.4.0-2.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Entering dire

Bug#1005473: gcc-11-cross-ports: FTBFS: s-tsmona.adb:160: undefined reference to `dladdr'

Source: gcc-11-cross-ports Version: 8 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > /bin/bash ./libto

Bug#997145: autoconf2.69: FTBFS: autoconf.texi:9: unknown command `setcontentsaftertitlepage'

Source: autoconf2.69 Version: 2.69-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[3]: Entering directory '/<>/doc' > Updating ./version.texi > restore=: && ba

Bug#978323: gdb-bpf: FTBFS: tar: /usr/src/gdb.tar.*: Cannot open: No such file or directory

Source: gdb-bpf Version: 2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201226 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Entering directory '/<>' > tar xf

Bug#975142: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#975142: lambda-align2: FTBFS: lambda.cpp:100:1: error: type variant with ‘TYPE_ALIAS_SET_KNOWN_P’

On 20/11/20 at 22:57 +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote: > Control: tag -1 unreproducible > > Hi Lucas, > > Lucas Nussbaum, on 2020-11-19 10:35:39 +0100: > > > /<>/src/lambda.cpp: At global scope: > > > /<>/src/lambda.cpp:100:1: error: type variant wit

Bug#975219: [Debichem-devel] Bug#975219: elkcode: FTBFS: internal compiler error: in lookup_field_for_decl, at tree-nested.c:288

Hi Michael, On 22/11/20 at 15:32 +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > Hi Lucas, > > That looks like an ICE, shouldn't that be filed with gfortran? Usually my logic is: if there's only one similar failure, I file a bug against the affected package, rather than against the toolchain package or the librar

Bug#954568: gcc-10-cross: FTBFS: x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0: undefined reference to `__twalk_r@GLIBC_PRIVATE'

Source: gcc-10-cross Version: 4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20200321 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[5]: Entering directory '/<>/gcc/b

Bug#954513: gcc-9-cross: FTBFS: checking whether .eh_frame section should be read-only... /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: /usr/x86_64-linux-gnu/lib/../lib/libpthread.so.0: undefined reference to `__libc

Source: gcc-9-cross Version: 19 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20200321 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > /bin/bash ./libtool --tag=CC --mode

Bug#954515: gcc-8-cross: FTBFS: x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0: undefined reference to `__twalk_r@GLIBC_PRIVATE'

Source: gcc-8-cross Version: 33 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20200321 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[5]: Entering directory '/<>/gcc/b

Bug#925567: gcc-8-cross: FTBFS: conftest.c:72: undefined reference to `getexecname'

Source: gcc-8-cross Version: 26 Severity: serious Tags: buster sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20190325 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS in buster on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in buster (in a buster chroot, not a sid chroot), your package failed to build on a

Bug#851047: gcc-6-cross-ports: FTBFS: 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file src/libphobos/configure.ac

Source: gcc-6-cross-ports Version: 11 Severity: serious Tags: stretch sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170111 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]:

Bug#851038: gcc-6-cross: FTBFS: 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file src/libphobos/configure.ac

Source: gcc-6-cross Version: 14 Severity: serious Tags: stretch sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170111 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Enteri

Bug#844855: gcc-5: FTBFS: conftest.c:136: undefined reference to `setproctitle'

Hi, Just for the record: I can still reproduce this failure. Lucas

Bug#844864: gcc-6: FTBFS: collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

Source: gcc-6 Version: 6.2.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: stretch sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161118 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > ../gcc/xgcc -c -

Bug#844855: gcc-5: FTBFS: conftest.c:136: undefined reference to `setproctitle'

Source: gcc-5 Version: 5.4.1-3 Severity: serious Tags: stretch sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161118 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > /tmp/ccAZve4U.o:

Bug#835777: gcc-5-cross: FTBFS: patch fails to apply

Source: gcc-5-cross Version: 24 Severity: serious Tags: stretch sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/rules b

Bug#835732: gcc-6-cross: FTBFS: patch fails to apply

Source: gcc-6-cross Version: 12 Severity: serious Tags: stretch sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Enteri

Bug#835714: gcc-6-cross-ports: FTBFS: patch fails to apply

Source: gcc-6-cross-ports Version: 9 Severity: serious Tags: stretch sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: E

Bug#835692: gcc-5-cross-ports: FTBFS: patches fail to apply

Source: gcc-5-cross-ports Version: 10 Severity: serious Tags: stretch sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160828 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/r

Re: Bug#831152: silly: FTBFS with GCC 6: dh_makeshlibs: failing due to earlier errors

On 14/07/16 at 13:57 +0200, Muammar El Khatib wrote: > Package: libsilly > Version: 0.1.0-7 > Followup-For: Bug #831152 > > Hi Lucas, > > > I have solved the bug, that was related to the symbols file. Should I upload > a new revision adding to 'Build-Depends' gcc-6 explicitely?. Otherwise, I >

Archive rebuild with GCC 6

Hi, I just did an archive rebuild with the gcc-defaults package from experimental, to use GCC 6. I filed quite a lot of bugs. All logs (of failed builds) are available at https://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2016/07/13/ Due to the large number of problems, there could be a couple of cases wher

Bug#830436: gnat-4.9: FTBFS: b_gnatb.adb:86: undefined reference to `__gnat_runtime_finalize'

Source: gnat-4.9 Version: 4.9.3-3 Severity: serious Tags: stretch sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > x86_64-linux-

Bug#769218: gcc-4.9: FTBFS in jessie: Error! CRCs do not match! Got 264aca47, expected 95962ba4

Source: gcc-4.9 Version: 4.9.1-19 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2014-11-11 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a sid chroot), your package failed to build

Bug#713323: gcc-snapshot: FTBFS: There were fixinclude test FAILURES

Source: gcc-snapshot Version: 20130603-1 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[4]: Entering d

Bug#713170: gcc-4.8: FTBFS: Error! CRCs do not match! Got 264aca47, expected 95962ba4

Source: gcc-4.8 Version: 4.8.1-3 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[2]: Entering directory

Bug#713133: gdc-4.6: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: automake (< 1:1.12) but 1:1.13.3-1 is to be installed

Source: gdc-4.6 Version: 0.29.1-4.6.4-3 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌───

Bug#713130: gcj-4.7: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: automake (< 1:1.12) but 1:1.13.3-1 is to be installed

Source: gcj-4.7 Version: 4.7.3-2 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌──

Bug#713120: gcj-4.8: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: automake (< 1:1.12) but 1:1.13.3-1 is to be installed

Source: gcj-4.8 Version: 4.8.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌──

Bug#713124: gnat-4.6: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: automake (< 1:1.12) but 1:1.13.3-1 is to be installed

Source: gnat-4.6 Version: 4.6.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌─

Bug#713126: gcj-4.6: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: automake (< 1:1.12) but 1:1.13.3-1 is to be installed

Source: gcj-4.6 Version: 4.6.4-2 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌──

Bug#707387: gcc-4.4: FTBFS: ../../../../src/libgcc/../gcc/config/i386/linux-unwind.h:138: error: field 'info' has incomplete type

Source: gcc-4.4 Version: 4.4.7-3 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130509 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > /«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/./gcc/

Bug#676733: gcc-4.4: FTBFS: libio.h:364: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

Source: gcc-4.4 Version: 4.4.7-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120609 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > /«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/./gcc/

Bug#674306: gcc-4.7: FTBFS: tests failed

Source: gcc-4.7 Version: 4.7.0-9 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120524 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. The full build log is available from: htt

Bug#669513: gnat-4.4: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: gcc-4.4-source (< 4.4.7) but 4.4.7-1 is to be installed

Source: gnat-4.4 Version: 4.4.6-6 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120419 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌─

Bug#669479: ppl: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lncursesw

Source: ppl Version: 0.11.2-6 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120419 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > x86_64-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CO

Bug#664957: gdc-4.4: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: gcc-4.4-source (< 4.4.7) but 4.4.7-1 is to be installed

Source: gdc-4.4 Version: 1.063-4.4.6-10 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌───

Bug#664954: gdc-4.6: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: gcc-4.6-source (< 4.6.3) but 4.6.3-1 is to be installed

Source: gdc-4.6 Version: 0.29.1-4.6.2-4 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌───

Bug#635126: status of ruby 1.9.1 wrt porting

On 29/08/11 at 23:48 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi, > > Ruby 1.9.3 is going to be released in september, and is a candidate for > the default ruby version in wheezy. A snapshot is available in > experimental. Now is an ideal time to work on porting issues and get the >

Bug#640314: closing, unreproducible

On 07/09/11 at 10:44 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > closing, unreproducible. please have a second look/try before filing these > kind > of bugs for GCC. Strange. Did you use a parallel build in your own try? Can you provide your build log? I suspect a problem with using parallel builds on this

Bug#635126: status of ruby 1.9.1 wrt porting

Hi, Ruby 1.9.3 is going to be released in september, and is a candidate for the default ruby version in wheezy. A snapshot is available in experimental. Now is an ideal time to work on porting issues and get the fixes integrated upstream. Ruby has a fairly large test suite, which makes finding pro

Bug#635126: miscompilation with -ftree-sra on armel and sparc.

On 17/08/11 at 10:38 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 16/08/11 at 22:36 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > tag 635126 + moreinfo help > > thanks > > > > are you still working on this, trying to get a test case? > > Hi, > > As I wrote in #634260: > &

Bug#635126: update?

On 16/08/11 at 22:36 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > tag 635126 + moreinfo help > thanks > > are you still working on this, trying to get a test case? Hi, As I wrote in #634260: n 24/07/11 at 12:19 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 23/07/11 at 12:16 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote

Bug#634546: gnat-4.6: FTBFS: make[4]: *** No rule to make target `../gcc/ada/rts-shared-zcx/libgnat-.so', needed by `gnattools-native'. Stop.

zcx/libgnat-.so', > needed by `gnattools-native'. Stop. > make[4]: Leaving directory > `/build/gnat-4.6-MRuh9Z/gnat-4.6-4.6.1/build/gnattools' > make[3]: *** [all-gnattools] Error 2 The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/07

Bug#618148: ppl: FTBFS: ! LaTeX Error: File `stmaryrd.sty' not found.

11/03/13/ppl_0.11.2-2_lsid64.buildlog A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes of the Grid'5000 platform, using a c

Bug#615157: gcc-4.6: -Wunused-but-set-variable -Werror does not imply -Werror=unused-but-set-variable

On 27/02/11 at 20:48 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Matthias Klose wrote: > > > this would require the build logs of all the *sucessful* builds from this > > rebuild. > > Indeed, "grep -F '[-Wunused-but-set'" does not dig up anything. After the rebuild, I did grep for that on all logs, but did

Bug#615157: gcc-4.6: -Wunused-but-set-variable -Werror does not imply -Werror=unused-but-set-variable

On 27/02/11 at 13:01 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > (-cc: debian-release) > Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > Matthias Klose wrote: > > >> yes, explicitly disabled in the package, for a limited time. If you > >> keep this warning enabled, it will result in too many build > >> failures. Somebody needs

Bug#591155: ppl: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency: xpdf-utils: Depends: poppler-utils

p://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2010/07/31/ppl_0.10.2-6_lsid64.buildlog A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes

Bug#577891: gcc-snapshot: FTBFS: ImportError: No module named classfile

: *** [stamps/ecj_binaries] Error 1 The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2010/04/15/gcc-snapshot_20100408-1_lsid64.buildlog A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welco

Bug#569375: gpc-4.1: FTBFS: Will run the testsuite with -m32: ld returned 1 exit status

available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not accessible from the build systems. -- | Lucas Nussba

Bug#556845: gcc-snapshot: FTBFS: libtool.m4: error: problem compiling CXX test program

is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not accessible from the build systems. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu.

Bug#556844: gnat-4.3: FTBFS:ali.adb:1825:41: (style) bad casing of "NUL" declared in Standard

.adt > ../../src/gcc/ada/xnmake.adb ada/bldtools/nmake_b > echo timestamp > s-options > echo '../../src/gcc/output.h' >> tmp-gi.list > gnatgcc -c -g -fkeep-inline-functions -gnatpg -gnata -nostdinc -I- -I. > -Iada -I../../src/gcc/ada ../../src/gcc/ada/csets.

Bug#552959: ppl: FTBFS: build blocks

_allowed_list: 0-7 Mems_allowed: ,0001 Mems_allowed_list: 0 voluntary_ctxt_switches:6796 nonvoluntary_ctxt_switches: 2400 (the T state is normal, I kill'ed -STOP it so I could get the ps output, but it was R or D before that. -- |

Bug#552959: ppl: FTBFS: build blocks

is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2009/10/28/ppl_0.10.2-3_lsid64.buildlog A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was d

Bug#542993: gpc-4.1: FTBFS: configure.ac:25: error: m4_copy: won't overwrite defined macro: _AC_ARG_VAR_PRECIOUS

s_7byte.c > patching file libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/cls_8byte.c > patching file libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/cls_9byte1.c > patching file libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/cls_9byte2.c > patching file libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/cls_align_double.c > patching file libffi/testsuite/libf

Bug#542976: gdc-4.1: FTBFS: configure.ac:25: error: m4_copy: won't overwrite defined macro: _AC_ARG_VAR_PRECIOUS

e libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/cls_7byte.c > patching file libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/cls_8byte.c > patching file libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/cls_9byte1.c > patching file libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/cls_9byte2.c > patching file libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/cls_align_double.c > patchi

Bug#542985: gdc-4.2: FTBFS: configure.ac:105: error: m4_copy: won't overwrite defined macro: _AC_ARG_VAR_PRECIOUS

lasspath/tools/classes/gnu/classpath/tools/jar/Main$ModeOption.class > DEB_VERSION=$(echo 0.25-4.2.4-3.1 | sed 's/ds[0-9]*//'); \ > export DEB_VERSION; set -x; \ > debian/patches/libjava-nojavac.dpatch -patch -d > /build/user-gdc-4.2_0.25-4.2.4-3.1-amd64-zVCwaF/gd

Bug#542974: gcc-4.2: FTBFS: configure.ac:105: error: m4_copy: won't overwrite defined macro: _AC_ARG_VAR_PRECIOUS

[0-9]*//'); \ > export DEB_VERSION; set -x; \ > debian/patches/libjava-nojavac.dpatch -patch -d > /build/user-gcc-4.2_4.2.4-6-amd64-pl0Wir/gcc-4.2-4.2.4/src > + debian/patches/libjava-nojavac.dpatch -patch -d > /build/user-gcc-4.2_4.2.4-6-amd64-pl0Wir/gcc-

Bug#489114: gcc-4.3: FTBFS: Bootstrap comparison failure!

e. But OK, I will just ignore those failures. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#489114: gcc-4.3: FTBFS: Bootstrap comparison failure!

n problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386 environment. Inter

Bug#482871: Please make GCC-4.3 the default on i386/amd64.

FYI, upstream will provide a --enable-cld option in 4.3.1. So it's no longer about having a Debian-specific patch, it's about enabling a non-default configure option. See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36079 . -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nu

Bug#482519: gdc-4.2: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency: gcc-4.2-source(inst 4.2.4-1 ! << wanted 4.2.4)

up tcl8.4 (8.4.19-2) ... > Setting up expect (5.43.0-16) ... > Setting up dejagnu (1.4.4.git20080407-1) ... > Setting up gcc-4.2-source (4.2.4-1) ... > Setting up libc6-amd64 (2.7-11) ... > Setting up libc6-dev-amd64 (2.7-11) ... > Setting up lib64gcc1 (1:4.3.0-4) ... > Setting up lib64gomp1 (4.3.0-4) ... > Setting up gcc-4.3-multilib (4.3.0-4) ... > Setting up gcc-multilib (4:4.3.0-4) ... > Setting up gperf (3.0.3-1) ... > Setting up libtool (1.5.26-4) ... > Setting up realpath (1.12) ... > Setting up lsb-release (3.2-12) ... > Checking correctness of source dependencies... > After installing, the following source dependencies are still unsatisfied: > gcc-4.2-source(inst 4.2.4-1 ! << wanted 4.2.4) The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2008/05/22 A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386 environment. Internet was not accessible from the build systems. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#464268: gcj-4.2: FTBFS: ../../src/gcc/config/i386/crtfastmath.c:96: error: size of array 'st_space' is too large

On 27/04/08 at 15:54 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > tag 464268 + unreproducible > tag 464268 + moreinfo > severity 464268 important > thanks > > Lucas Nussbaum writes: > > reopen 464268 > > thanks > > > > On 06/02/08 at 16:35 +0100, Lucas Nussba

Bug#474888: #474888: gnat-4.3: FTBFS: Bootstrap comparison failure!

On 26/04/08 at 13:57 +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > Lucas Nussbaum writes: > > On 26/04/08 at 01:50 +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > >> Lucas, have you been able to reproduce this bug? > > > > No, gnat-4.3 still fails, but not this way (#477964). > >

Bug#477964: gnat-4.3: FTBFS: grep: ../libgnatvsn/gnatvsn.ads: No such file or directory

On 26/04/08 at 10:22 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Lucas Nussbaum writes: > > On 26/04/08 at 01:47 +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > > > severity 477964 important > > > tags 477964 moreinfo > > > merge 477964 465671 > > > thanks > > > > >

Bug#474888: #474888: gnat-4.3: FTBFS: Bootstrap comparison failure!

On 26/04/08 at 01:50 +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > Lucas, have you been able to reproduce this bug? No, gnat-4.3 still fails, but not this way (#477964). -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3

Bug#477964: gnat-4.3: FTBFS: grep: ../libgnatvsn/gnatvsn.ads: No such file or directory

ures. Two > days ago. > > Since you build with 8 parallel threads, I think this is another > symptom of #465671. Merging. Maybe. Maybe it would be better to disable parallel builds for gnat-4.3? -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL

Bug#477964: gnat-4.3: FTBFS: grep: ../libgnatvsn/gnatvsn.ads: No such file or directory

is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2008/04/25 A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes of

Bug#474888: gnat-4.3: FTBFS: Bootstrap comparison failure!

uild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386 environment. Internet was not accessible from the build systems. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] G

Bug#467603: gcj-4.3: FTBFS: patching failed.

ong -p or --strip option? > The text leading up to this was: > -- > |--- libstdc++-v3/doc/html/documentation.html~2008-01-18 > 21:29:26.0 +0100 > |+++ libstdc++-v3/doc/html/documentation.html 2008-01-19 18:06:02.112585097 > +0100 > ---

Bug#464268: gcj-4.2: FTBFS: ../../src/gcc/config/i386/crtfastmath.c:96: error: size of array 'st_space' is too large

reopen 464268 thanks On 06/02/08 at 16:35 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 06/02/08 at 14:55 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > tag 464268 + unreproducible > > thanks > > I can't reproduce it anymore, so either it's a random failure, or > something changed betwe

Bug#465580: gcc-4.2: FTBFS: ../../src/gcc/config/i386/crtfastmath.c:96: error: size of array 'st_space' is too large

On 18/02/08 at 07:21 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > tag 465580 + unreproducible > thanks > > Lucas Nussbaum writes: > > On 14/02/08 at 14:40 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > you were not able to reproduce this the last time. Why file it again? > > > > Erm

Bug#465580: gcc-4.2: FTBFS: ../../src/gcc/config/i386/crtfastmath.c:96: error: size of array 'st_space' is too large

package probably means that it's a random issue affecting all gcc packages... Might be caused by a problem with the handling of "parallel" builds. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F

Bug#465671: gnat-4.3: FTBFS: fname-sf.adb:28:06: file "fname-uf.ads" not found

/2008/02/13 A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid

Bug#465580: gcc-4.2: FTBFS: ../../src/gcc/config/i386/crtfastmath.c:96: error: size of array 'st_space' is too large

t; ../../src/gcc/config/i386/crtfastmath.c:106: warning: left shift count >= > width of type > ../../src/gcc/config/i386/crtfastmath.c:106: warning: integer overflow in > expression > make[5]: *** [crtfastmath.o] Error 1 The full build log is available from: http:

  1   2   >