Bug#233891: [hppa] maxima/acl2 failures at -O1/-O2, -O0 ok

On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 03:58:23PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote: > it seems that acl2 now builds on hppa. Can we close this bug? yes. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#151886: [Gcl-devel] Re: gcl/maxima on hppa

On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 10:17:04AM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote: > Greetings! I think I may have stumbled on a possible explanation for > gcl's build failure on hppa. Hppa alone will not relocate (i.e. allow > dlopen to open) modules not compiled with -fPIC. All other > architectures on which dlope

-2.93745e-306 != 0

Bug #158290 talks about an issue with gcc 3.0 on hppa. Specifically, building perl 5.8 with -O2 fails tests, while -O1 works. Any thoughts on the subject? mawk also suffers from the same ailment. thanks, lamont

Bug#137959: Bug #137959

> Can you clarify whether this is a new failure, or one that has just gone > unnoticed previously? The blas package has previously built (although auric is down so I can't see _which_version...). I don't know if this code changed between then and now, or if this is a new bug in g77. > I'm downg

Bug#137959: g77 errors in blas

severity serious -- marking serious since this bug is keeping several packages out of woody. lamont

Bug#105102: Build failure on ia64 (at least)

Package: gcc-3.0 Version: 3.0.ds9-4 Priority: serious Filing this serious because hppa plans to release with woody. As the Debian Architecture Bug Squash party continues this weekend, it is quite likely that additional info and/or patches may be added to this defect. The following build failure