user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
usertag 392669 not-a-bug
thanks
> Package: openssh-server
> Version: 1:4.3p2-5
> Severity: normal
> File: /usr/sbin/sshd
>
> Hello,
>
> recently I discovered the following bit of code in the source file
> "openssh-4.3p2/openbsd-compat/xmmap.c" (function 'xmmap', around line
Package: gcc-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-10
Severity: minor
-Wunused-variable
Warn whenever a local variable or non-constant static variable is
unused aside from its declaration This warning is enabled by -Wall.
^^^
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Package: gcc-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-10
Severity: normal
In the following program, gcc fails to recognize that "n" is
uninitialized, unless the "sscanf" line is commented out. I expected
no change at all, since sscanf() is called after foo(). Since the
compiler is responsible for guaranteeing that th
Package: gcc-4.0-doc
Version: 4.0.3-3
Severity: minor
s/DegaGnu/DejaGnu/; s/incorrekt/incorrect/; gccint.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gcc-4.1
Version: 4.1.0-4
Severity: minor
For a call, if it was executed at least once, then a percentage indi-
cating the number of times the call returned divided by the number of
times the call was executed will be printed. This will usually be
100%, but ma
Package: pinfo,cpp-doc
Version: 0.6.9-2
Severity: normal
pinfo cpp
Implementation-defined behavior (near the bottom)
Scroll down one line at a time, using the down arrow; in an 25 row
xterm, I go down 13 times.
Notice the "*Note fdollars-in-identifiers::." reference. It is in
red, which mea
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.3-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
mode(2) reads:
mode must be specified when O_CREAT is in the flags, and is
ignored otherwise.
I straced the result of
open(buf, O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_EXCL);
and the effective value of the third parameter w
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 01:26:50PM +0800, Paul Harris wrote:
> I would imagine this below:
>
> >
> > if (0==c && 1==c)
>
> isn't a good idea, because it would break symmetry with custom
> operator==() behaviour.
Okay, I'm no CPP guy though :)
Is it a problem to warn in C, only? I know little
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.2-4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
gcc will warn on something like
char c;
// ...
if (c>256) {
// warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type
// ...
}
Please consider also warning on things like:
if (0==c && 1==c)
--
To
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.2-2
Severity: minor
In $(man gcc), I the following two problems:
-Wunused-function
...
non\-inline static function is unused. This warning is enabled by
^^^
-M Instead of outputting the result of preprocessing, output a rule
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-2
File: /usr/share/man/man1/gcc.1.gz
Severity: minor
The manpage section describing -fwrapv says:
This flag enables some optimizations and disables other.
Here, "other" should be pluaralized to "others".
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 4.0.1-3
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
I have a static function, the address of which is passed to a curl_*
library function for use as a callback. The function is otherwise
unused. Compilation with gcc:
cc -W -Wall -Winline -O6 -g -std=gnu99 -DPATH_SEP=\'/\' -Wl,-
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-2
File: /usr/share/man/man1/gcc-4.0.1.gz
I see:
-Wunused-function
Warn whenever a static function is declared but not defined or a
non\-inline static function is unused. This warning is enabled by
-Wall.
--
To UNS
Package: gcc
Severity: minor
Version: 3.3.5-3
I see:
-Wunused-function
Warn whenever a static function is declared but not
defined or a non\-inline static function is unused.
where \- is apparently overescaped.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
Package: gcc-3.3
Severity: normal
Tags: security
When compilation of the included C program is attempted with "gcc
-std=gnu99 usnoquery.c.FREEZE.c", the compilation stalls, apparently
indefinitely.
Tagged security because it supposedly involves a stack smash:
#47 0xb7f15c43 in malloc () from /
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.5-8
Severity: minor
The manpage gcc.1 under -finline-limit=n says:
Note: pseudo instruction represents, in this
particular context, an abstract measurement of
function's size. In no way, it represents a count of
assembly instruction
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 12:29:10AM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'd love to be able to create a static library archive with a
> > command like gcc -o libfoo.a -c {a,b,c,d}.c.
>
> Why? What would be the advant
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.5-8
Severity: wishlist
I'd love to be able to create a static library archive with a command
like gcc -o libfoo.a -c {a,b,c,d}.c.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:Justin Pryzby
>Organization:
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: GCC ignores mismatched prototypes involving integers
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: medium
>Category: c
>Class: accepts-illegal
>Release:
Greetings,
I've been working on creating a Debian package of IRAF to be sponsored
by Zed Paubre. I've been able to narrow down a build problem to the
4/30/2004 upload of a new Debian version of gcc-3.3.
As it turns out, IRAF has license problems that will likely prevent it
from getting to debian
20 matches
Mail list logo
