Bug#1014696: [PATCH] add a DEP-8 autopkgtest

2022-07-10 Thread John Scott
hangelog b/debian/changelog --- a/debian/changelog 2021-11-02 09:09:37.0 -0400 +++ b/debian/changelog 2022-07-10 10:17:53.840907340 -0400 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +libiberty (20211102-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium + + [ John Scott ] + * Add a DEP-8 test leveraging some functionality of libiberty

Bug#994933: please revert the changes in 2.69-3 and re-add the add-runstatedir backport

2021-09-23 Thread John Scott
Package: autoconf2.69 Version: 2.69-3 Severity: important Justification: breaking change, not in NEWS, makes draft packages FTBFS Control: block 994770 by -1 Control: block 985563 by -1 Hi, I'm working on packaging binutils-sh-elf, and I know of someone else working on updating binutils-m68hc1x.

Bug#985837: document in README.source how README.Debian is generated from README.Debian.m4

2021-03-24 Thread John Scott
Source: gcc-defaults Version: 4:11-20210116-1 Severity: wishlist I wanted to send a merge request to clarify some language in README.Debian, but there doesn't seem to be any information on how README.Debian is generated from README.Debian.m4. The most intuitive way would be with a call like deb

Bug#977797: provide gcc-source metapackage

2020-12-20 Thread John Scott
Source: gcc-defaults Version: 4:10.2.0-1 Severity: minor Control: affects -1 src:open-ath9k-htc-firmware The open-ath9k-htc-firmware package builds a custom cross-toolchain prior to the firmware. To reduce my maintenance burden of bumping the version and also catch incompatibilities sooner, it w

Bug#972936: libgcc-s1-dbgsym is Protected: yes

2020-11-29 Thread John Scott
On Thursday, October 29, 2020 9:08:12 AM EST Julian Andres Klode wrote: > My suggestion is to set XB-Important: yes and Protected: yes on > libgcc-s1 such that people cannot easily remove it after it's installed. This has migrated to testing and is having an unexpected consequence for me: > WARNIN

Bug#973443: src/init2.c:52: MPFR assertion failure

2020-10-30 Thread John Scott
Package: libmpfr6 Version: 4.1.0-3 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: I was fooling around with Arb and it seems that this program causes an assertion failure in MPFR, although ASan and UBSan don't point to any misusage by Arb. (Curiously if you change the numerical string from "0" to "0.5" then Arb