Re: gcc-3.0 and C++

On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 12:19:47PM -0500, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote: > I haven't had any problems with gcc-3.0 compiling or linking executables > (including C++). If you're using gcc-3.0 to compile C++ sources, then > you'll need to pass it at least -lstc++ at link time (and possibly quite > a

gcc-3.0 and C++

'lo, sorry to bother you. gcc 2.x compiles C++ source files fine, but gcc-3.0 doesn't. (g++-3.0 seems to work okay). Is this a deliberate change? (trying to compile C++ with gcc-3.0 fails with undefined references to new and delete) -- "While you're technically correct, you are quite wrong" - J