Hi,
On 11/05/18 00:55, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 10.05.2018 11:24, Bill Allombert wrote:
>> Package: g++-8
>> Version: 8.1.0-1
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> Hello GCC maintainers,
>>
>> trying to the attached dummy file with g++-8 fails:
>>
>> g++-8 -m32 hello.c
>> In file included from /usr/include/
Hi,
On 04/01/18 11:00, YunQiang Su wrote:
> Package: src:gcc-7
> Version: 7.2.0-18
>
> when detect mipsn32 triarch,
> we use ifeq ($(biarchn32)-$(biarch32),yes-yes), but we should use
> ifeq ($(biarch64)-$(biarch32),yes-yes)
>
I guess you attached the wrong patch?
James
signature.asc
On 23/11/17 11:42, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> YunQiang,
>
> Do you know of any drawbacks ?
This has been raised before:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-mips/2016/10/msg00049.html
I think it's generally a good idea. You wouldn't want to "enforce" this
- you would set it as an overridable default
Control: tags -1 patch
Hi,
On 07/11/17 13:45, James Cowgill wrote:
> Control: forwarded -1 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82880
>
> Hi,
>
> On 06/11/17 18:07, James Cowgill wrote:
>> On 06/11/17 12:11, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>> Package: gcc-7
>
Control: forwarded -1 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82880
Hi,
On 06/11/17 18:07, James Cowgill wrote:
> On 06/11/17 12:11, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> Package: gcc-7
>> Version: 7.2.0-12
>> Severity: serious
>> Control: affects -1 src:amanda
>>
&g
Hi,
On 06/11/17 12:11, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Package: gcc-7
> Version: 7.2.0-12
> Severity: serious
> Control: affects -1 src:amanda
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=amanda&suite=sid
>
> ...
> checking for gcc flag -fstrict-aliasing...
> E: Build killed with signal TERM after 3
Hi,
On 24/09/17 10:36, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> Package: libgo11
> Version: 7.2.0-5
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: upstream
> X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-go-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Currently the pkg-go team uses gccgo to build Go packages on MIPS*
> archs. However currentl
Control: tags -1 patch
Hi,
On 23/08/17 17:42, James Cowgill wrote:
> This bug is very closely related to an earlier GCC bootstrap failure on
> mips64el: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78660
> In comment 17 Matthew sent a patch and applying it also fixes this bug.
>
Package: gcc-7
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
It appears that gcc-7 no longer compiles in Thumb mode by default on
armhf.
My guess is that it was caused by this change which was intended to
remove all the java / gcj code:
https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/gcccv
, he tells me it has some other issues and isn't suitable to be
applied (which is presumably why it was reverted).
James
commit 21398b7c319ed013741a9b249cb2315a098b6753
Author: James Cowgill
Date: Tue Aug 22 11:33:47 2017 +0100
Disable LRA on mips as a workaround
diff --git a/gcc/c
Control: reassign -1 gcc-7 7.1.0-13
Control: severity -1 important
Control: retitle -1 gcc-7: ppc64el: miscompiles ffmpeg's
scalarproduct_int16_vsx at -O1
Control: forwarded -1 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81833
Control: affects -1 src:ffmpeg
Hi,
On 09/08/17 06:47, Adrian Bunk wr
Control: reassign -1 gcc-6 6.3.0-6
Control: tags -1 - sid
Control: forwarded -1 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79560
Control: retitle -1 gcc-6: libgccjit is broken on mips*
Hi,
I've checked recent versions of GCC and this bug is still present in
gcc-6 and gcc-7 and I've submitted it
src:jackd2
Hi all,
On 19/12/16 23:39, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Dec 2016 22:56:00 +0000 James Cowgill wrote:
> [...]
>> On 15/12/16 23:18, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
> [...]
>>> I experienced a grave bug: as soon as the client (audacious, firefox through
Control: found -1 6.2.1-6
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: tags -1 patch
Hi,
On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 17:17:03 +0200 Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: src:gcc-5
> Version: 5-20150327-1
> Severity: important
> Tags: sid stretch
> Forwarded: https://gcc.gnu.org/PR65618
>
> seen building trunk 2015
Hi,
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 14:47:48 + (UTC) Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> Source: gcc
> Version: 6.2.0-7
> Severity: serious
>
> As said, I built virtualbox correctly with 6.2.0-6 and then uploaded on
> unstable.
> The new gcc 6.2.0-7 broke the build with the following error:
[...]
> /usr/inc
Hi,
On 29/09/16 18:17, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + help
>
> Please find out why libgo isn't configured to use libffi.
It looks like the necessary support for go closures on mips isn't
implemented in the version of libffi in gcc 6.
There appears to be a PR here which fixes it:
htt
Control: reassign -1 g++-4.9 4.9.2-1
Control: retitle -1 g++-4.9: generates invalid assembly building x42-plugins on
mipsel
Control: affects -1 src:x42-plugins
Control: tags -1 unreproducible
On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 14:55:49 +0200 (CEST) Jaromír Mikeš
wrote:
> Package: gcc
> Version: 4.9_4.9.2-19
>
mes Cowgill wrote:
> > On Sun, 2015-05-24 at 22:32 +0300, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 11:00:18PM +0100, James Cowgill wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2015-05-23 at 00:04 +0300, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 05:27:14PM +0100
On Sun, 2015-05-24 at 22:32 +0300, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 11:00:18PM +0100, James Cowgill wrote:
> > On Sat, 2015-05-23 at 00:04 +0300, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 05:27:14PM +0100, James Cowgill wrote:
> > > > Ye
On Sat, 2015-05-23 at 00:04 +0300, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 05:27:14PM +0100, James Cowgill wrote:
> > Yep it's a hardware problem. The following assembly dies (raises SIGILL)
> > at 'sqrt.s' on the Loongsons and works everywhere
On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 16:12 +0100, James Cowgill wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 16:41 +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> > Program received signal SIGILL: Illegal instruction.
>
> eder and all the other machines eso-midas has failed on are Loongson
> machines. I'll have a fu
On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 16:41 +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Dear Mailing list,
>
> a few weeks ago, I found a problem that I thought is related to gfortran;
> however I am unsure whether this is really the case.
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/781892
>
> Basically it burns down to the following minimal
Source: gnat-4.9
Version: 4.9.2-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Hi,
I managed to successfully bootstrap gnat on mips64el, but it required a
small patch to the build system for it to build on Debian. It's similar
to patches used on other 64-bit arches and is due to Debian not putting
the 64-bit
go on mips64
since it's built by gcc-4.9 as well. I didn't enable gcj in the
gcj_archs field because gcj seems to be broken on mips64el (I haven't
investigated why).
Thanks,
James
From 55efad3ed9530dbfddce85bfce8cc272f162363e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: James Cowgill
Date: Mon,
On Fri, 2014-12-12 at 15:36 +, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
>
> ACL dm: not allowed to upload source package 'gcc-defaults'
Sorry, I uploaded it to the wrong queue (it should have been sent to a
private repo). God help me if I ever become a DD.
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-re
25 matches
Mail list logo
