On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 08:05:44AM +0300, Ivan Maidanski wrote:
> Let’s try it when v8.2.2 is released.
> configure should be called into variants:
> ./configure [--enable-shared --disable-static]
> ./configure --disable-shared --enable-static
Implemented with
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/li
65;6601;1cOn Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 06:50:04PM +0300, Ivan Maidanski wrote:
> >How come --enable-static means the .so doesn't use symbol visibility?
> >Would it be a better idea to build twice -- once to enable symbol
> >visibility on the .so and then again to produce the .a?
> Good point. This is h
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 02:36:55PM +0300, Ivan Maidanski wrote:
> > One problem is that upstream change [1] appears to have removed
> >the exported symbols GC_next_used_block and GC_unmap_end.
> These 2 symbols are internal ones (and have never been public since
> appearance in 8.0.0), they just h
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 01:50:05PM +0300, Ivan Maidanski wrote:
> The libgc package in sid ( https://packages.debian.org/sid/libgc-dev
> ) is at version 8.0.4, which was released in Mar 2019.
> It would be great if the package can be updated since there are
> quite many fixes as listed in its
Package: gcc-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-7
Tags: +patch
Followup-For: Bug #377012
Hi,
The attached patch just differentiates the libssp name
-i
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Sh
Package: gcc-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-7
Severity: important
Hi,
Since gcc-4.1 (the system gcc) provides libssp0-dev, this makes a
cross compiler (which is also trying to provide it) uninstallable
along side it. e.g.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/cross$ sudo dpkg -i
gcc-4.1-ia64-linux-gnu_4.1.1-7_i386.deb
dp
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.2-6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
Thanks for making it quite easy to build a cross compiler on Debian.
The only problem I have had is that the packages by default depend on
the -base package used by the system gcc.
This means whenever I upgrade my system gcc I
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 12:46:12AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> ok, Ian, if it's ok with you, I'll prepare a libunwind upload, which
> plays well with a libgcc1 package including the libunwind7 shared
> libs.
It's actually Matthieu's package so he needs to have the final say so;
it's a "rock and
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 05:30:38PM -0800, David Mosberger wrote:
> That would make sense. libstdc++5 calls _Unwind_Resume() which
> is/should be implemented by libunwind.so.7. With older versions of
> GCC, it was implemented as part of libgcc_eh.a/libgcc_s.so.
Actually, when I checked with ldd I
I'm pretty sure this relates to my message
http://lists.debian.org/debian-ia64/2003/debian-ia64-200306/msg00031.html
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.2-0pre1
Severity: normal
Try this simple test program on IA64
--- test.c ---
#define SZ (1L<<32)
char x[SZ];
char y[SZ-1
Package: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20030531-2
Severity: wishlist
Is there any particular reason why the Debian build
process doesn't use -j for multiple jobs? Attached is a patch
that keeps my machine busy and cuts the build time a bit.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Arch
Package: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20030301-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
Below is a small patch to README.snapshot to give a sample wrapper
script for gcc-snapshot. I recently made one but forgot the " " around
my $@ and was stumped as to why gcc would not parse it's command line
correctly.
13 matches
Mail list logo
