Re: Approval to upload gcc-defaults 1.70?

On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:54:13AM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:11:30PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Have you narrowed done the problem to find if it is a gcc bug or a > > kernel bug? > > > > It fails with gcc-4.3, and works fine with all previous versions... > >

Re: Approval to upload gcc-defaults 1.70?

On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 02:48:09PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Grant Grundler writes: ... > > Has anyone built a kernel with this version of gcc-4.3 and tried it? > > Can I "apt-get install -t sid gcc-4.3" on my hybrid system and get > > the right version? >

Re: Approval to upload gcc-defaults 1.70?

On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 02:48:09PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Grant Grundler writes: > > On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 11:53:54PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > ... > > > FYI the glibc testsuite with gcc-4.3 on HPPA now gives the same results > > > than with gcc-4.

Re: Approval to upload gcc-defaults 1.70?

On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 11:53:54PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: ... > FYI the glibc testsuite with gcc-4.3 on HPPA now gives the same results > than with gcc-4.2, except on one FPU test, due to a bug in the *glibc*. > > So it *seems* HPPA is ready for gcc-4.3 by default. Has anyone built a kernel

Re: [alpha, hppa] GCC-4.3 as the default compilers for lenny?

On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 06:24:12PM +, rubisher wrote: ... >> I looked at gcc-43 build output to check warnings related to networking >> as suggest by John David Anglin. ... > That remember me that when I discover those new warnings with gcc-4.2 >

Re: [alpha, hppa] GCC-4.3 as the default compilers for lenny?

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:20:35AM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote: > Another gcc problem report: > > That past weekend I built the latest parisc-2.6-25-rc6 kernel from > Kyle's tree using gcc-4.1, gcc-4.2, and gcc-4.3. All three kernels > booted but the networking only worke

Re: [alpha, hppa] GCC-4.3 as the default compilers for lenny?

On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 06:42:44PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have tried to build the glibc with GCC 4.3 on hppa, and rpcgen > > segfaults when it is used, so the build fails. I haven't start to > > investigate

Re: [alpha, hppa] GCC-4.3 as the default compilers for lenny?

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:20:35AM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote: > Another gcc problem report: > > That past weekend I built the latest parisc-2.6-25-rc6 kernel from > Kyle's tree using gcc-4.1, gcc-4.2, and gcc-4.3. All three kernels > booted but the networking only worke

Bug#364231: [parisc-linux] Re: Bug#364231: exception catching broken on HPPA

On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 11:22:20AM -0400, John David Anglin wrote: ... > I recognized that this was going to cause pain, and brought the matter > up for discussion on the parisc-linux list a few months ago. There > wasn't much in the way of comments for or against. In the end, I > decided it was

Bug#347508: libstdc++6-4.0-dev: 4.0.3/libstdc++.a BFD: sh_link in section XXX is incorrect

Package: libstdc++6-4.0-dev Version: 4.0.2-5 Severity: important $ ar t /usr/lib/gcc/ia64-linux-gnu/4.0.3/libstdc++.a BFD: /usr/lib/gcc/ia64-linux-gnu/4.0.3/libstdc++.a(bitmap_allocator.o): sh_link [281] in section `.IA_64.unwind.text._ZN9__gnu_cxx9free_list6_M_getEm' is incorrect BFD: /usr/lib/g

Bug#342545: qt-x11-free build fails

On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 01:05:11AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Grant, thank you for your work to date on this bug. (BTW, it would be > helpful if you would follow up to bug #342545 on libgcc2, instead of bug > #341675 which is filed against just one of the many packages affected by > it). Stev

Bug#319818: gcc-4.0-hppa64: /etc/alternatives/hppa64-linux-gcc link is invalid (missing "-gnu")

Package: gcc-4.0-hppa64 Version: 4.0.1-2 Severity: normal parisc kernel builds fail after installing gcc-4.0-hppa64. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cd /usr/src/linux-2.6 grundler <500>make /home/src/linux-2.6/scripts/gcc-version.sh: line 11: hppa64-linux-gnu-gcc: command not found /home/src/linux-2.6/scrip

Re: Removing gcc-3.0 from unstable/testing

On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 08:11:46PM +0300, Martin-?ric Racine wrote: > Wasn't PALO (the bootloader) also build-dependant upon 3.0 at some point? Not really. It was a coincendence palo built with gcc 3.0 worked and palo built with later gcc didn't. The bug was in palo and I'm pretty sure paul fixed

Bug#228421: gcc 3.0.4 generates bad code on Debian 3.0/PARISC

On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 06:05:17PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > But the root of the problem lies in gcc 3.0.4 since it is OK in 3.3.2. So > wouldn't it be easier to identify and backport the fix from 3.3.2 to 3.0.4 > and inform all projects that they must recompile everything on parisc ? "recompi

Re: [parisc-linux] gcc-3.3 configuration

On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 01:08:54AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > I'm not sure it's my call to make; I can see arguments on both sides. Having no clue about dwarf vs sjlj (or whatever), I have to trust *someone* to make the right call. If it's clearly the right direction, then figure out how to ge

Bug#180048: fastjar-doc.dpatch: line 19: automake-1.4: command not found

Package: gcc-3.2 Version: 1:3.2.1-0pre3 Severity: normal tried to build gcc-3.2.2 on ia64 w/o depending on libc6 2.3.1. dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us ... patching file fastjar/Makefile.am patching file fastjar/fastjar.texi patching file fastjar/fdl.texi patching file fastjar/gpl.texi patching file fa

Re: [parisc-linux] gcc-3.? compiler for hppa (3.1, 3.1+dwarf2, 3.2cvs20020429?)

Matthias Klose wrote: > Sm9obiBEYXZpZCBBbmdsaW4gd3JpdGVzOg0KPiA+IFdoaWxlIHByZXBhcmluZyBnY2MtMy4x > IHBhY2thZ2VzIEkgbm90aWNlZCBtYW55IGVoLXJlbGF0ZWQgcmVncmVzc2lvbnMNCj4gPiBm ... Matthias (and others), base64 encoded email doesn't archive well: http://lists.parisc-linux.org/pipermail/parisc-linux/200