On Sunday 13 September 2009 10:01:55 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> What is the package that provides the java alternative with the
> rmiregistry slave ?
From looking at the output of
update-alternatives --query java
it appears to be this alternative that is causing the problem:
Alternative: /usr/bi
On Friday 11 September 2009 14:24:49 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Sep 2009, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > the only "fix" I can think of would be adding conflicts to every
> > package listing rmiregistry et al as a slave alternative. But I
> > don't know these packages, so it's likely that we clo
Package: java-gcj-compat-headless
Version: 1.0.80-5.1
Severity: important
Doing 'aptitude safe-upgrade' has left java-gcj-compat-headless
not-configurable. The
aptitude error is:
Setting up java-gcj-compat-headless (1.0.80-5.1) ...
update-alternatives: error: alternative rmiregistry can't be ma
Package: gcj-4.4-jre-headless
Version: 4.4.1-1
Severity: important
Doing 'aptitude safe-upgrade' on my squeeze system has resulted in
gcj-4.4-jre-headless being unable to be configured. The aptitude error is:
Setting up gcj-4.4-jre-headless (4.4.1-1) ...
update-alternatives: error: alternative r
4 matches
Mail list logo