Bug#944127: gfortran-9 causes libcgns FTBFS on ppc64el

2019-11-04 Thread Gilles Filippini
Gilles Filippini a écrit le 04/11/2019 à 20:00 : > Unfortunately it currently doesn't build against gcc-snapshot, and I'm > not at ease with the reported errors. I eventually succeeded at building against gcc-snapshot, adding '-fallow-argument-mismatch'. The cgread_f03 t

Bug#944127: gfortran-9 causes libcgns FTBFS on ppc64el

2019-11-04 Thread Gilles Filippini
Hi Matthias, Matthias Klose a écrit le 04/11/2019 à 19:21 : > Control: forwarded -1 https://gcc.gnu.org/PR92361 > > On 04.11.19 18:13, Gilles Filippini wrote: >> I've recently uploaded libcgns 8.4.0-1~exp1 to experimental. All >> builds but ppc64el are ok. >> >

Bug#944127: gfortran-9 causes libcgns FTBFS on ppc64el

2019-11-04 Thread Gilles Filippini
Package: gfortran-9 Severity: serious Justification: Causes FTBFS -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, I've recently uploaded libcgns 8.4.0-1~exp1 to experimental. All builds but ppc64el are ok. The ppc64el failure [0] occurs in the test suite (test cgread_f03), when a C va_arg

Bug#920022: gfortran: doesn't generate reproducibly the same object file for an unchanged fortran source file

2019-01-21 Thread Gilles Filippini
Package: gfortran Version: 4:8.2.0-2 Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, I'm filing this bug against gfortran because I can't find any related piece of information anywhere about this reproducibility problem. I'm just one step to achieve the Reproducible builds

Bug#759558: closed by Matthias Klose (Bug#759558: fixed in gcc-4.9 4.9.1-10)

2014-08-31 Thread Gilles Filippini
Control: reopen -1 Hi, A couple of symlinks are still broken in 4.9.1-10: $ find /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-4.9-kfreebsd-amd64/ -type l -xtype l -ls 26864550 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root root 62 Aug 31 03:22 /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-4.9-kfreebsd-amd64/include/linux/jni_md.h -> ../.

Bug#759558: gcj-4.9-jdk: broken symlinks for j{awt,ni}{,_md}.h

2014-08-29 Thread Gilles Filippini
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 00:30:56 +0200 Matthias Klose wrote: > Am 28.08.2014 um 18:08 schrieb Steven Chamberlain: > > reassign 759558 gcj-4.9-jdk > > found 759558 gcc-4.9/4.9.1-9 > > thanks > > > > gcj-4.9-jdk isn't a source package, so the BTS seems a little confused > > about who to mail about this