On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 05:24:07PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> tag 427907 + moreinfo
> thanks
>
> Please recheck with gcc-4.3/gcc-snapshot
Still reproducible with newest gcc-4.3.
gcc-snapshot seems to be older than gcc-4.3 currently, so not tested
with that, yet.
Gruess
: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
| **
| Build finished at 20071125-0809
| FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
Full build log(s):
http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?&ver=0.25-4.2.2-3d1&pkg=gdc-4.2&arch=alpha
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
dea how gcj works.)
Jar file: http://people.debian.org/~djpig/451757/
Will test -save-temps later today.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
18-0418
| FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
Full build log(s):
http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?&ver=1.8.0.9-1&pkg=hsqldb&arch=hppa
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I can't reproduce this ICE with either g++-4.1 or g++ from gcc-snapshot.
The bug seems to be specific to g++-4.2
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
# still present
found 440378 20070902-1
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
uild'
| s=`cat status`; rm -f status; test $s -eq 0
| make[1]: *** [stamps/05-build-stamp] Error 1
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gdc-4.1-0.24-4.1.2'
| make: *** [stamps/05-build-stamp] Error 2
| **********
| Build finished at 20070903-2256
| FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
Full build log(s):
http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?&ver=0.24-4.1.2-16exp1&pkg=gdc-4.1&arch=hppa
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 04:31:38PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-28 15:14]:
> > > Can you still reproduce this bug? I cannot with gcc-snapshot
> > > 20070720-1 (the latest on hppa).
> > I get another ICE now, b
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 11:53:30AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-06 15:41]:
> > Happened while trying to build a current linux-2.6 from Linus' tree:
>
> Can you still reproduce this bug? I cannot with gcc-snapshot
&
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
reassign 426302 gcc-4.1
severity 426302 normal
# same issue
merge 426302 427907
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Error 2
| make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20061217/build'
| s=`cat status`; rm -f status; test $s -eq 0
| make[1]: *** [stamps/05-build-stamp] Error 1
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20061217'
| make: *** [stamps/05-build-stamp] Error 2
| **
| Build finished at 20070221-2356
| FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
Full build log(s):
http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?&ver=20061217-1&pkg=gcc-snapshot&arch=hppa
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
Package: gcc-4.0-locales
Version: 4.0.3-8
Severity: serious
gcc-4.0-locales -8 still depends on cpp-4.0 even though cpp-4.0 is not
build anymore for this revision. This will make this package
uninstallable once the old cpp-4.0 binary is removed.
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System
*
| Build finished at 20060402-1019
| FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
Full build log(s):
http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?&ver=1.0.54-1&pkg=java-gcj-compat&arch=sparc
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 07:55:00AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> OK, sorry for the confusion but I really didn't want to see Aurélien
> just stop this work which I'm pretty sure he's doing well.
>
> For dpkg, I think I've seen some discussion but Guillem Jover
. CC set accordingly.
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kerne
Hi.
I can't reproduce this bug, neither with the dpkg in sarge nor the one
in sid. Since the information which dpkg was actually used by the
submitter is not contained in the bug report I'm not able to judge
wether it has been fixed or wether I just miss a trigger.
Gruesse,
--
Frank L
merkel --^ (the people that can use newraff probably
wouldn't ask the question ;))
> dependencies will show you the latest version, and which archs that
> version is built for. You should run linda or lintian over your
> package, as th
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 10:00:30PM +, James Troup wrote:
>
> What documentation? There is none in the libgcc1 package.
Yeah, the same copyright file is used for the whole source package.
So this bug should probably be reassigned to gcc-3.4-doc or
the source package...
Gruesse,
--
the documentation licensed under the GFDL
is considered non-free, which is true. This would be a similar bug to #193787
against gcc-3.3 and sarge-ignore like it.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
19 matches
Mail list logo
