Bug#372152: g++-4.1: PR27935 appears to be unresolved (operator delete(void*, size_t) issue)

Package: g++-4.1 Version: 4.1.1-2 Severity: normal describes what appears to be simply a size_t issue: struct a { void operator delete (void*, unsigned int); ~a(); }; void g(a *b) { delete b; } fails to compile. But of course size_t isn't necessarily unsigned

Bug#91512: Something's still wrong

> certain for now. Right, I've done that and things work OK again. Does a bug against libdb2 need to be raised? How many other libraries might be affected? [...] -- Bruce Stephens [EMAIL PROTECTED] ACI Worldwide/MessagingDirect http://www.MessagingDirect.com/>

Bug#91512: Something's still wrong

Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Bruce Stephens writes: > > When compiling today's XEmacs (tag release-21.2), I get the same error > > I was getting with gcc-2.95-2.95.3-8: > > please get -9 or -10 (from incoming). Sorry, I should have been mo

Bug#91512: Something's still wrong

ibraries) to be rebuilt with the new gcc? -- Bruce Stephens [EMAIL PROTECTED] ACI Worldwide/MessagingDirect http://www.MessagingDirect.com/>

Bug#91512: Temporary hack

Using "gcc -u atexit" instead of gcc seems to be a temporary solution for people who need to compile things before the new gcc is available. -- Bruce Stephens [EMAIL PROTECTED] ACI Worldwide/MessagingDirect http://www.MessagingDirect.com/>