[I am not subscribed to debian-gcc or c-std-porting]
Hi Florian,
At 2023-04-18T16:07:45+0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> TL;DR: I want to propose a GCC 14 change which will impact
> distributions, so I'd like to gather some feedback from Debian.
>
> Clang has disabled support for a few historic C f
Package: gcc
Version: 4:6.3.0-4
Severity: important
$ man gcc
No manual entry for gcc
See 'man 7 undocumented' for help when manual pages are not available.
$ dpkg -S gcc|grep -F man1/gcc. || echo nope
nope
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'test
[I am not subscribed to -arm; please keep the bug number in your followups
if you'd like me to see them.]
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 11:03:59PM +, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 12:37 -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Here are his remarks, recast a bit from
[I am not subscribed to debian-arm.]
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 11:03:59PM +, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 12:37 -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Here are his remarks, recast a bit from IRC-speak into something more
> > conventional.
> >
> > GC
ce team on this issue.
I'm also curious to know if xterm has always had this problem on Debian
ARM, or if it has cropped up only with recent revisions of GCC. Can anyone
tell me?
For further background, please see the logs of this bug at:
http://bugs.debian.org/285396
--
G. Branden Robins
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 12:18:07AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Branden Robinson writes:
> > On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 11:02:15AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > Branden Robinson writes:
> > > > Package: gcc-3.3
> > > > Versi
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 11:02:15AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Branden Robinson writes:
> > Package: gcc-3.3
> > Version: 1:3.3.3-0pre3
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > [I checked 1:3.3.3-1, and it doesn't have this functionality, either.]
> >
> >
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.3-0pre3
Severity: normal
[I checked 1:3.3.3-1, and it doesn't have this functionality, either.]
Please apply the following patches from upstream CVS so that glibc can
also be modified to support backtracing on ia64.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/Ch
libncurses-dev is also a pure virtual package.
I recommend: libncurses5-dev | libncurses-dev
--
Branden Robinson | GPG signed/encrypted mail welcome
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 1024D/9C0BCBFB
Progeny Linux Systems | D5F6 D4C9 E25B 3D37 068C
| 72E8 0F42 191A
Come to think of it, does gcc-2.95 need to depend on an Essential
package at all?
awk is in the weird position of being a virtual Essential package,
thanks to mawk.
If gawk specifically is needed, then gawk is what should B-Ded on.
--
Branden Robinson | GPG signed/encrypted mail
Package: gcc-2.95
Version: 1:2.95.4-17
Severity: normal
gcc-2.95 should not Build-Depend on a pure virtual package.
I suggest changing the current build-dep on "awk" to "gawk | awk".
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux zuul.progeny.com 2.4.20-
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 09:35:15PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Branden Robinson writes:
> > As far as we know the XDM authorization compile problem affects both
> > 4.2.1 and 4.3.0, so you could just grab the latest xfree86 out of
> > unstable.
>
> at least with the
y, the miscompilation is not PowerPC specific. It happens on
i386 as well, and probably everywhere.
--
G. Branden Robinson| To stay young requires unceasing
Debian GNU/Linux | cultivation of the ability to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3-2
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
This is a regression from GCC 3.2.
While compiling XFree86 for mips and mipsel, each build fails
identically.
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=xfree86&ver=4.2.1-7&arch=mipsel&stamp=1054296758&file=log&as=raw
http://build
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3-2
Severity: important
Tags: upstream, moreinfo
You're going to need more information from me on this, I'm sure, but I'm
filing the bug now so I don't forget to file it at all.
When testing XFree86 4.2.1-7 on my PowerPC I found that compiling the
tree with -O2 (per
led into think the equality *was* true for
libstdc++.
Thanks for the clarification.
--
G. Branden Robinson|
Debian GNU/Linux | // // // / /
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | EI 'AANIIGOO 'AHOOT'E
http://people.debian
. If it's
not a FAQ, then I'd say go with what you've got above and close the bug.
If it *is* a FAQ, I suggest explaining the incongruity. :)
Thanks for guiding my stupid mind through this.
--
G. Branden Robinson|
Debian GNU/Linux |
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 10:57:30PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Branden Robinson writes:
> > Package: libstdc++5
> > Version: 1:3.2.2-0pre3
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > libstdc++3 - The GNU stdc++ library version 3
> > libstdc++5 - The GNU stdc++ librar
Package: libstdc++5
Version: 1:3.2.2-0pre3
Severity: normal
libstdc++3 - The GNU stdc++ library version 3
libstdc++3-dbg - The GNU stdc++ library version 3 (debugging files)
libstdc++3-dev - The GNU stdc++ library version 3 (development files)
libstdc++3-doc - The GNU stdc++ library version 3 (doc
19 matches
Mail list logo
