iding alternate packages like gcc-5-stripped and keeping the
gcc-5-plugin-dev package depending on unstripped cc1plus (so keep gcc-5 and
g++-5 providing unstripped binaries)
Cheers.
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basilestarynkevitchnet mobile: +33 6 8501 2
iding alternate packages like gcc-5-stripped and keeping the
gcc-5-plugin-dev package depending on unstripped cc1plus.
Cheers.
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basilestarynkevitchnet mobile: +33 6 8501 2359
8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, F
y) libbacktrace to compress the debug sections.
BTW, I don't see the size of cc1 etc... as an issue. Compilers are
useful on "development" machines, and these are usually not very small
(and have enought disk space).
Cheers
--
Basile Starynkevitchhttp://starynkevitch.net
ii libc6 2.19-19
ii libgmp-dev 2:6.0.0+dfsg-7
gcc-5-plugin-dev recommends no packages.
gcc-5-plugin-dev suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
Regards.
--
Basile Starynkevitch http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
France bas...@starynkevitch.net
workin
packages.
gcc-5-plugin-dev suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
Regards.
--
Basile Starynkevitch http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
France bas...@starynkevitch.net
working on http://gcc-melt.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debi
e case. We had clang plugin working
> in
> the past too.
>
How can a plugin call existing GCC functions, e.g. walk_gimple_seq
declared in
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/plugin/include/gimple-walk.h and
implemented inside cc1 ?
(Unless you don't strip the dynamic symbols linked wi
<http://git.hadrons.org/cgit/debian/gcc-on-diet.git/>
in case others find it useful. And I guess I could create a package
repository for it, if there's demand.
Don't do that. If you strip cc1 & cc1plus (etc...) you cannot have GCC
plugins.
Regards
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH
20: Error: expecting string instruction after `rep'
>
> I think it is a compiler`s issue.
Yes. The compiler emits "rep; ret" (or perhaps "rep ret") and the recent
binutils are not happy with that.
see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2011-03/msg00286.html
Cheers
Hello All,
It would be very nice, for GCC plugin developers,
to have a gcc-4.7-dbg package which would provide the debugging variant of gcc,
cc1, cc1plus
What do you think about that?
Cheers
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basilestarynkevitchnet
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 04:35:54PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 24.09.2012 16:24, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 03:14:42PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:10:50PM +0200, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> >>>
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 03:14:42PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:10:50PM +0200, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> > Ok, to say it in other words:
> >
> >experimentally, a plugin which calls fatal_error (and this is definitely
> > an
>
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 01:49:29PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 24.09.2012 13:27, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-09/msg00232.html for details about my
> > suggestion.
> >
> > The message
>
plugin failures also trigger it.
I suggest to replace it with
The bug is not reproducible, so it could be a plugin, hardware or OS problem
Regards.
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basilestarynkevitchnet mobile: +33 6 8501 2359
8, rue de la Faiencerie
e the -dbg variants of debian packages made)
Cheers
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basilestarynkevitchnet mobile: +33 6 8501 2359
8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France
*** opinions {are only mine, sont seulement les miennes} ***
--
To UNSUBS
_matrix
00ad9dc0 T ppl_read_polyhedron_matrix
00ad9500 T ppl_set_coef_gmp
00ad9450 T ppl_set_inhomogeneous_gmp
00ad9750 T ppl_strip_loop
Why not use libppl.so.9 in cc1?
Cheers
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basilestarynkevitchnet mobile: +3
linux-gnu --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.6.1 20110421 (prerelease) (Debian 4.6.0-5)
% gcc -O3 -c preprocessed.i
## succeeded
So you could try using gcc-4.6
Regards.
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basile
appropriate place.
By the way, I am interested: how is gengttype installed in the
gcc-4.6-plugin-dev package? I am the GCC (upstream) guy who improved
gengtype, and as far as I know the gcc/Makefile.in rule to install it was
missing in (GCC FSF) 4.6.0...
Regards.
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http
l 0.10.2 (or 0.11)
configure it with --enable-interfaces=c at least.
Comment: Roberto Bagnara, the main author of PPL, did add (a few years
ago) the functions `ppl_io_asprint_Coefficient'
`ppl_io_asprint_Linear_Expression' `ppl_io_asprint_Constraint'
`ppl_io_asprint_Constraint_S
Matthias Klose wrote:
[posted on both gcc@ & debian-gcc@ lists]
On 14.03.2010 13:15, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
See also http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-03/msg00129.html &
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-03/msg00132.html - for those new to MELT see
http://gcc.gnu.
Basile Starynkevitch wrote in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2010/03/msg00047.html
Now, one of the issues about MELT & Debian packaging is the fact that
melt-runtime.c (the source of melt.so plugin) uses GTY
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Type-Information.html#Type-Informa
124.html message) could be of
interest to debian-gcc@lists.debian.org I am also BCC-ing it to them.
Regards.
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basilestarynkevitchnet mobile: +33 6 8501 2359
8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France
*** opinions {ar
the generated
gt-melt-runtime.h into GCC MELT svn tree (perhaps under contrib/) if
that helps Debian to package it.
Comments are welcome (but beware that I Basile am not very familiar with
Debian packaging, and even that I am still scared by the complexity of
GCC building procedures, no
22 matches
Mail list logo
