Bug#289045: gcc-3.3: gcc packages do not use the alternative system

2005-01-07 Thread Attila Kinali
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:15:38 +0100 Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Attila Kinali wrote: > > On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:56:04 +0100 > > "Falk Hueffner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ln -s /usr/bin/gcc-3.4 /usr/local/bin/gcc > > > >

Bug#289045: gcc-3.3: gcc packages do not use the alternative system

2005-01-07 Thread Attila Kinali
ks belong to the package managment. I don't mind if you say i'm not supposed to touch them by hand. But there is a default which version of gcc should be used. And if there is a default there should be a way to change _this_ default _with_out_ using a workaround. Attila Kinali

Bug#289045: gcc-3.3: gcc packages do not use the alternative system

2005-01-07 Thread Attila Kinali
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:35:55 +0100 "Falk Hueffner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Attila Kinali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 07.01.05 09:27:43: > > > On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 23:38:08 +0100 > > "Falk Hueffner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > &g

Bug#289045: gcc-3.3: gcc packages do not use the alternative system

2005-01-07 Thread Attila Kinali
t one ? > I'm not sure whether gcc should be managed by an alternative; > we already have "cc" as an alternative. I'll leave that for others to > decide. It should, gcc is nothing different than vi or a window manager or a terminal emulation. Attila Kinali

Bug#289045: gcc-3.3: gcc packages do not use the alternative system

2005-01-06 Thread Attila Kinali
get overwritten on every update. eg i have gcc-3.3 and gcc-3.4 installed currently, with 3.4 as default. With the last update of gcc-3.3 all my symlinks got overwriten. This should be denfintily fixed and done the correct way. Attila Kinali -- System Informa