Hi Adrian,
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:04:24AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> A bug buried somewhere in the Debian bts would not change anything.
Probably that's correct.
> What would have to happen would be a Debian MIPS porter debugging
> this problem and then submitting a minimal testcase to gcc
Hi Matthias,
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 03:55:18PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 26.07.2013 15:35, schrieb Andreas Tille:
> > BTW, it would have been perceived even without the unfriendly tenor. In
> > case you might not know the team is maintaining a wide range of packages
>
Hi Matthias,
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 02:37:15PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 25.07.2013 14:25, schrieb Michael Banck:
> > What to do about the compatibilty is a different matter, did this come
> > up before?
>
> looks like one hand in the debian-science team doesn't know what the other
> ha
Package: gij-3.0
Version: 1:3.0.4-7
Severity: important
~> sudo apt-get install gij-3.0
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
gij-3.0
0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 8398B
4 matches
Mail list logo
