new: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
And indeed, hash-table.h contains:
#include
which I'm not sure is really supposed to exist.
If you need more info, please ask.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
-- System Inf
tps://sourceware.org/ml/libffi-discuss/2013/msg00130.html
>
Actually the patch is now included upstream, but now it needs to be
enabled with --enable-pax_emutramp.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
t;
> Philipp,
>
> With all due respect, So far I have not seen any bug report causing the
> gcc-4.7 as default compiler being serious enough to make it reverted.
> Name the problematic bugs then, please. And, where is the big problem,
> please explain?
You mean something like
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-gcc-4.7;users=debian-gcc@lists.debian.org
?
>
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On mer., 2012-03-21 at 23:50 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Yves-Alexis Perez, le Wed 21 Mar 2012 22:47:11 +0100, a écrit :
> > Can't the plugin be rebuilt when needed (meaning, when it's used to
> > actually build something)?
>
> That'd make it quite more i
eam version
> > changes, not every upload.
>
> Apparently the check includes hashes that are unique to the build.
>
Can't the plugin be rebuilt when needed (meaning, when it's used to
actually build something)?
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
sume from it,
and from your question if I am using a development version of Debian,
that "the ultimate plan" is that the gcc package depend on the gcc-X.Y
package which was used to build the kernel?
Put another way: *must* the kernel in a stable release be compiled with
the *de
reopen the bug and
assign it to the package gcc rather than gcc-4.1, then? I presume you
can do tha? Or would that be too much trouble? Thank you.
Alexis
PS Such a blase attitude towards bug reports does neither (a) you, nor
(b) Debian any favours.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
kernel packages are being distributed built with gcc-4.1 then this
missing symlink is a problem.
That the user has to type:
cd /usr/bin
ln -s gcc-4.1 gcc
should clearly not be a prerequisite to build a kernel module.
Alexis
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT
No more hassle for your slow PC.
http://XIIcuvfLYJozvtvbif7wivcv4tacwb.solicsol8.com/?izqbkabeyjrlnvwm
Alexis
so whats on tonight at Fri, 08 Apr 2005 09:03:32 +0400
http://vsF.storedirect.info
dont care
http://uaI.storedirect.info/r/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#x27;?
Thank you.
Since a bug clearly *does* exist (although possibly not inside the gcc
package), I presume/hope that the above does *not* mean that the bug
will simply be ignored, right?
Alexis
else
ask the user which to make the default
delete any existing 'alternative' symlinks for cc
create new ones pointing to just-determined default
If you need more info, please let me know!
Alexis
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Arch
12 matches
Mail list logo
